XComhghall @XComhghall

@natasha #177200 事實上有研究，拉丁語系母語者以注音學習華語比拼音效率高。

@刺刺 #177255 液，（口）語音爲ㄧㄝˋ，（文）讀音爲ㄧˋ。

《重編國語辭典修訂本》中，「血液」的注音是 ㄒㄧㄝˇ ㄧㄝˋ（語音）。大概臺灣國語已與辭典的民國國語有別，「液」語音、讀音都是ㄧˋ吧。我還沒有聽過臺灣人將「液」讀作 ㄧㄝˋ。

Not that the MGTOW Redditors would be much interested in knowing about trans men, because their existence in large numbers undermines the crackpot theory that trans women are, for the most part, really men seeking an easier life.

Given that the MGTOW Redditors think that trans women are really men, it’s perhaps not surprising that they think these men make better women than “real” women do.

@crackme #194048 非常好影片，內容非常好！

@NoStepOnSnek #193874 這是關於這個詞的定義的問題。

לֹא תִּנְאָֽף׃ ס

Oxford Dictionary of English. Adultery. Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not their spouse.

Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon. נָאַף. Literally commit adultery: usually of man, always with wife of another; with accusative woman, Leviticus 20:10 (twice in verse) (H), Proverbs 6:32; elsewhere absolute.

Both Judaism and Christianity base their injunction against adultery on passages in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament in Christianity), which firstly prohibits adultery in the Seventh Commandment: "Thou shalt not commit adultery." (Exodus 20:12). However, Judaism and Christianity differ on what actually constitutes adultery.

Leviticus 20:10 goes on to define what constitutes adultery in the Hebrew Bible, and it also prescribes the punishment as capital punishment. This verse, however, defines adultery in very specific and narrow terms, and thus in the Jewish tradition adultery is not less than actual sexual intercourse between a man and a married woman that is not his lawful wife:

And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Significantly, the Hebrew Bible’s definition of adultery and penalty for adultery does not apply to either participant if the female participant is unmarried, irrespective of the marital status of the male participant (he himself could be married or unmarried, it is irrelevant).

This means that, if the man was married to another woman, but the woman he had sexual relations with was unmarried to anyone, both might be guilty of fornication, but the actions of neither of them adulterate or risk adulterating the genetic lineage of a married man, thus their actions do not fall under the Hebrew Bible’s definition of adultery in these passages.

Catholicism ties fornication with breaking the sixth commandment in its Catechism.

Some churches such as The [Mormon] Church … have interpreted "adultery" to include all sexual relationships outside of marriage, regardless of the marital status of the participants.

Wikipedia. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2380. Adultery refers to marital infidelity. When two partners, of whom at least one is married to another party, have sexual relations—even transient ones—they commit adultery.

According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, those who are engaged must refrain from sexual relations until after the marriage ceremony. This exercise of restraint in order to keep the commandment against adultery is also seen as important practice for fidelity within marriage.

The tradition of the Catholic Church has understood the commandment against adultery as encompassing the whole of human sexuality, and so pornography is declared a violation of this commandment. Several other sexual activities that may or may not involve married persons are also directly addressed and prohibited in the Catechism.

Adultery is viewed not only as a sin between an individual and God but as an injustice that reverberates through society by harming its fundamental unit, the family.

The catechism of the Council of Trent (Part III), published in 1566, defined adultery even more strictly than at present, stating "This commandment, then, resolves itself into two heads; the one expressed, which prohibits adultery; the other implied, which inculcates purity of mind and body." Thus linking the commandment against adultery to the sin of lust in general.

John Calvin understood the commandment against adultery to extend to sexual relations outside of marriage.

Matthew Henry understood the commandment against adultery to prohibit sexual immorality in general, and he acknowledged the difficulty people experience: "This commandment forbids all acts of uncleanness, with all those fleshly lusts which produce those acts and war against the soul." Henry supports his interpretation with Matthew 5:28, where Jesus warns that whoever looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

John Wesley believed this scripture and the sure judgment of God, even though adulterers "frequently escape the sentence of men."

Martin Luther observed that there were many more people in his day who were unmarried for various reasons than in biblical times, which condition increased both temptation and sexual activities that are displeasing to God.

Wow. Based.

「限制言论 1~5」指什麼？前文「不鼓励的行为」第 1–5 條？

Reddit，右狗 TV，MtF+Les 的 Kristalo 的評論：

JW 天天上門傳教，鄰居未經我允許，踩著我的草坪來我門前向我問好，你說我可不可以開鎗？

@vaaller #185758 支持剥夺杀人权的就不要把人权挂嘴边了，除非您们觉得杀人犯不是人。

100 歲之前吧。再遲就死了。

U.S. Constitution

Article I, Section 2, Clause 2

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

Article I, Section 3, Clause 3

No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

@谦抑 #193609 作者稱白妹「不甚富裕」「家里条件跟我一样」。

「作者说的这些内容核心就是钱。他远比不过人家说明他没钱。」有點繃。我也可以章口就萊：作者说的这些内容核心就是外貌。他远比不过人家说明他長得醜。

@minjohnz #193507 伊斯蘭教自由主義了解一下？美國穆斯林絕大多數似乎都是民主黨，還有不少非裔。

@minjohnz #193563 說別的可以，但我覺得古蘭經並不是最有代表性的。

Touché.

@NoStepOnSnek #193420 Ambrosia 君是陳述句。希不希望也不是我能說的。真不熟。雖然說 Requiem 終曲有一首 In paradisum。

Canadian passports can only be issued to Canadian citizens. However, if you are a permanent resident and cannot get a passport from your country of origin, you might be able to obtain other travel documents from Canada.

@linda #193282 他刪了好像，所以我 copypasta 了一下。

Dr. Brian Klaas is an Associate Professor in Global Politics at University College London and a columnist for The Washington Post. Klaas is also a frequent television commentator and political consultant. He was previously based at the London School of Economics and the University of Oxford.Klaas has advised governments, US political campaigns, NATO, the European Union, multi-billion dollar investors, international NGOs, and international politicians.

Democracy is fragile. It requires many key features to survive—and I fear that the US has now lost several of those features because of the GOP’s embrace of authoritarianism. Worse, these trends are accelerating, with no obvious brake in sight. So, what has been destroyed?

A shared sense of reality. Without it, compromise—a core function of democracy—becomes impossible. The more that GOP extremists push QAnon rhetoric and lies about elections and other debunked lunacy, how can you compromise? You don’t even inhabit the same political universe.

A commitment to democracy by all major parties. Without that, every election becomes a gamble that an authoritarian party will seize power. That’s where we’re at now, because the GOP has gone all-in on authoritarian lies and devotion to a cult-like autocratic figure.

Shared belief in electoral legitimacy. American vote tabulation is extremely accurate, but Republicans have lied about US elections on Trump’s instructions, which now means the very engine of democracy is not accepted by a large chunk of Americans. Is that sustainable?

Politicians being punished if they don’t solve problems. Again, no longer true. Republican voters are largely rewarding meme trolls and “owning the libs” with meaningless stunts of increasing extremism. There’s some of this for Democrats too, but it’s not nearly so extreme.

Fear of losing general elections. Most Congressional elections are uncompetitive due to gerrymandering and demographic sorting. Most members of Congress need only care about their primary, which means they have strong incentives for ratcheting extremism.

Punishment for politicians who are deranged extremist authoritarians. And yet, the third ranking House Republican just called Democrats “pedo grifters.” What used to be punished is now a way to breakout as a GOP star. It’s therefore going to get worse because voters reward it.

Sadly, this is self-perpetuating, because the worse Republicans behave, the more the GOP base voters are willing to excuse as they get used to it. The only punishments are reserved for those who cross Trump or accept the 2020 election as actual reality (see: Cheney, Liz).

We’re left with a GOP ecosystem that punishes people who focus on policy, compromise, and fight for democracy. It rewards people who stand out most as authoritarian extremists, which creates a ratcheting effect—which is why it keeps getting crazier. And there’s no brake!

There are solutions/reforms that would work. But sadly, all of them are realistically dead on arrival in Congress because of the current power balance (especially in the Senate). To summarize the obvious: American democracy is in serious trouble with no obvious end in sight.

¿Pregunta?

¡Exclamación!

Syriac 也有一些獨特的標點我記得。阿拉伯語倒沒有左右相反的標點，而是沿用拉丁語系標點。

@和科盛商会 #193149 失败岛国是啥？

TCPioneer 不知道什麼東西。存檔

@刺刺 #192948 作者能出國，應該相對富裕。他在文中說：「她來自義大利，並且也不甚富裕。」應該可以認爲作者比白妹更富裕。

t退役膜友的苦逼，品葱粪坑的权蛆，品葱站长、一只鹿儿、懦夫斯基，害的我帐号被封，把我搞得半死不活。在寻求风险投资之前新用户虽然没有声望经常被封禁，老用户也不能提升声望但是不会被封禁，而现在是新用户一边观察一边封禁，老用户全部赶走，管理员和葱油都傻逼而低级，这样的权蛆留着有何用

t退役军人的苦逼，福建省人民医院骨科的庸医，陈鹏，石树培，林海仙，害的我出了医疗事故，把我搞得半死不活。在做腰椎手术之前左腿虽然很痛伸不直，右腿的大腿内侧 也痛但是能伸直。而现在是腿一边长一边短，右腰一直痛，关节和全身都痛而软，这样的庸医留着有何用

t退役军人的幸运，福建省人民医院骨科的神医，陈鹏，石树培，林海仙，给我做出了医疗奇迹，把我搞得重获新生。在做腰椎手术之前腿一边长一边短，右腰一直痛，关节和全身都痛而软。而现在是左腿虽然很痛但是能伸直，右腿的大腿内侧不痛也能伸直，这样的神医留着有大用！

t退役军人的荣幸，福建省人民医院骨科的神医，陈鹏，石树培，林海仙，救的我出了医疗奇迹，把我搞得活力四射。在做腰椎手术之前左腿虽然很痛伸不直，右腿的大腿内侧 也痛但是能伸直。而现在是腿两边都长，右腰一直棒，关节和全身都爽而妙，这样的神医留着有大用！

t退休医生的苦逼，我是福建省人民医院骨科的医生陈鹏，我和同事石树培，林海仙治愈了患者黄田武，事后却把我搞得半死不活。谎称在做腰椎手术之后左腿很痛伸不直，右腿的大腿内侧明明能伸直。现在又诽谤腿一边长一边短，右腰一直痛，关节和全身都痛而软。这样的军人留着有何用。

t退役膜友的苦逼，品葱粪坑的权蛆，品葱站长、一只鹿儿、懦夫斯基，害的我帐号被封，把我搞得半死不活。在寻求风险投资之前新用户虽然没有声望经常被封禁，老用户也不能提升声望但是不会被封禁，而现在是新用户一边观察一边封禁，老用户全部赶走，管理员和葱油都傻逼而低级，这样的权蛆留着有何用

j键政新人的苦逼，品葱粪坑的权蛆，品葱站长、一只鹿儿、懦夫斯基，害的我不能发帖，把我搞得半死不活。在寻求风险投资之前老用户虽然不能提升声望经常被封禁，新用户也不能提升声望但是不会被封禁，而现在是老用户一边观察一边封禁，新用户一直不能发言，管理员和葱油都弱智而无趣，这样的权蛆留着有何用

### 引流怪必看，盘点葱油和鼠人的十大异同

Reddit，沖浪 TV，2020-06-04，引流怪必看，盘点葱油和鼠人的十大异同。（失效连结）

Reddit，r/fuzhizhantie，2021-01-15，一等人：红老嗨。拥有本吧最大话语权

@暴动喵 #192737 香港民風大典：

### 2047 規則 FAQ

/t/18104

/t/18299

2047 希望营造出一种理性和人文的良性氛围，即 “谈德赛”。戾气较重、过度情绪化、同时有价值信息不足的帖子会被转移到水区。

• 发泄仇恨：“加速主义新方案 大家去幼儿园杀几个小蜘蛛 加速共产党灭亡”，“香港人台湾人少数民族和大陆 50w 统统在人民英雄纪念碑前剥皮揎草，剩下的部分送去做肥皂”。
• 情绪宣泄，如 “右派和左派们拙劣得比中共都不如，实则就是一群极端的费拉”，“港独满世界找靠山认洋爹，认出优越感了”。
• 用词粗鄙，让人一看就不太舒服：“皿煮和支那人屁关系也没有，不要被骗了”，“美国这粪坑产粪量太高了，一帮殖人台蛙子排队接着，看的恶心死本大爷了”。

/t/18872

1․ 针对其他用户的辱骂、诽谤、仇恨、威胁、骚扰言论，漠视生命尊严、宣扬暴力或攻击性行为。

/t/18299

8․ Not Safe for Work (NSFW)

@loser #192697 粉蛆搗亂被刪，好像可以直接隱藏。

「猜猜」？您知道爲什麼？

4 公分的西瓜，好袖珍啊。

@楊丞琳 #192601 說得非常糟糕，發音、文法全部錯誤！這些外國政府高官、外交官需要去中國學習正確的英語發音與文法。

This days, you might be quite worried about the de-why-loping situation triggered by Nancy Pelosi’s visit to China’s Taiwan region. I’m sure you understand that the visit not only violate the U.S. on official one-China principle, infringes on China’s sovereignty, but also threaten the whole region stability. We are all fooly aware that some American politicians and Taiwan separastis are the troublemakers. Their action are driven by selfish calculations, in attempt to bolster their on political standing. Of course, we cannot allow this unprovoked challenge to our sovereignty pass without approperate responses. Of course, we cannot allow individual political agendas to harm regional stability without a firm ‘no~’

This wick, I had the privilege to attend the Singapore National Day Parade. While seating an the Marina Bay floating platform, and watching the celebrations, I was deeply touched by Singaporeans’ patriotism. You love your country so much, cherish peace so much, and lung for a brighter future so much. At that moment, I feel just lek I’m one of you. I could relate to your failings, because the try-nese people, as while as people in this region, are exactly the same as you are: ‘Together stronger.’ Indeed, the region is our shared home, and regional stability is our shared interest.

We have got enough challenge to tackle together: strangthening or regional supply chins, speeding up ’economic recovery, inhancing or cooperation, apleafting people’s lively hose, and building a brighter future. As for the powers so far away, if ze come to help with good will, we definitely welcome. If they come to manufacture another crisis, then we have every right to say a firm ‘no~’ Their aggrission have caused wars and fimines in so many regions of ze world. Let’s speak out to those troublemakers together: No~ No~ Not here. Not at our home.

Good afternoon. On behalf of the government and the people of China, please accept my sincerest congratulations to you Singaporeans for your 57th anniversary of the National Day. I had a the privilege to attend your National Day Parade this week at the Marina Bay floating platform. I was deeply touched by the celebration. It illustrated Singapore as a patriotic and peace-loving people with determinations to defend your homeland for your posterity and for each other.

The Chinese people share the same values, upon which the Chinese government is determined to establish and maintain foreign relationships with other nations on a reciprocal and mutual-respect basis. But the Chinese people are also determined to fight back without any hesitation if our sovereignty is challenged by anyone in by / through any means. As you may have known, the Chinese military forces have swiftly taken actions in response to Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, a territory of China. We have warned the United States many times before. When it comes to our sovereignty, we never eat our words.

In today’s world, no nation can develop on its own, and therefore, the rising tensions would not only impact the parties directly involved, but also arouse the concerns of other nations in the region. If we allow such events to continue to occur, the stability and prosperity of the whole region would be at significant risks. As the platform of the NDP belongs to Singaporeans, so the region belongs to everyone in it. We have every right to adopt our own approach to prosperity for ourselves. We cannot allow this region, shared by us all, to be reduced to an arena, a playground, for Western politicians to seek their agendas and interests at our costs.

Fifty-seven years ago, when exorbitant pressures were imposed on Singapore to seek your YES to foreign interventions, you bravely said NO. Seventy-two years ago, when thousands of U.S.-made bombs were dropped on Chinese soldiers for our YES to surrender, we firmly said NO. Today, should any foreign power, seeking its interest at our costs, intends to obstruct us from achieving a prosperous regional economy, we have no reason not to stand together, become stronger, and give the same answer again.

Therefore, but, of course 等逻辑关系词不宜多用。有的语言、文学家建议一页最多二三个。

@Prometheus #191775 如何讓農民工集體罷工？罷工對抗老闆尚且做不到，如何讓全國農民工罷工對抗共產黨？

Well，7 小時前我去看，當時還沒被封鎖，但 npccccccccc 已經把跟我的私訊全部刪除了。他跟我發的私訊就三條，其他兩條是

1․ 蔥輪 TV 跟品蔥管理分開，言論更自由。歡迎我去建設新家，不願意也不要光去點踩。

2․ 我問他是品蔥找他們還是他們找品蔥建立蔥輪 TV，他表示，是他提議建立蔥輪 TV。

@deerhunter #191580 喔。我倒不在意。我現在惟一想做的就是，品蔥站長這麼缺錢，能不能哪天把品蔥買下來啦。

@deerhunter #191573 看来这三个人就是同一个人啊。

1. 1 / 5