2047

你应该多去看看外国人每天看英文媒体 电视节目 期刊报纸 各种智库政坛发言 不要天天看法轮功媒体（他们虽然真反共但我觉得他们可能有病） 外国说的看的都是CHINA CHINESE 五星中国是一个整体 就是几千年中国 还有美国新清史和中国边疆研究 美国否认夏朝历史存在 美国说维吾尔斯坦（新疆）图博（西藏）有大汉族主义 中国汉人欺负少数民族 九十年代就有七块论 美国历史学界基本是反汉的 说中国“Han supremacy” 美国保守右派对汉民族主义都是批判态度 现在针对华人的种族敌视与仇恨 也有很多 不列举了 我其实真不知道中国本身怎么就必须是西方敌人 印度就是伙伴

圣人不死，大盗不止

科学只是支撑资本主义的工具，没有科学的研发新产品人们就不会掏钱去消费，没有消费整个资本链全断了。所以不管是国家还是科技公司都会掏出一大笔钱来支持科学，本质还是为了夺走平民赚取的钱，让平民一辈子当成工具来用。所以我还是更愿意相信宗教而不是所谓的科学，科学从来只是发现并研究现有事物，并没有能力创造出在这个世界上存有的这些完美生命体。

怎么，我4.06注册就没有发言资格？就代表我的评论不具有真实性和说服力？

美國和中國的財政問題 半斤八兩

美國國債34萬億，單利息近5000億美元

中國地方政府債務7到11萬美元

現在比的是誰先倒下

華爾街那群人不會把雞蛋放在一個籃子裡

閣下4月6日加入這個論壇，說“这里有许多新注册用户”，“有五毛之嫌疑”，是不是有點不妥

你会错意了 我写出的文字也只是说蓬佩奥在这件事上做得好。

至于你说的未来民主中国也可能和美国有摩擦冲突，另当别论，实际上概率很低，哪怕有矛盾也不一定是敌对关系，而是民主集团内部分歧，这个方向的话题不值得太过在意，因为很遥远，同时具备防备心是常识，不用刻意提，尤其是在蓬佩奥坚定反共的帖子尤其我表达信息有限的楼下发布这种关注点偏移甚者带歪楼的回复，实际上是有五毛之嫌疑，希望您在2047谨慎回复，这里有许多新注册用户

人工智能、外籍勞工取代了大部分就業崗位

有部分人註定會被淘汰的

龐佩奧在外交上是相當薄弱的

外交原則是鬥而不破

撕破臉只會讓中國的親美勢力無法周旋

比如關閉了中國的休斯頓領事館，然後呢？只會讓中國的間諜活動藏入底下，更難追蹤

再舉個例子，中國的金融機構名義上接受黨的領導，而實際上美國每次制裁中國官員，中國的銀行和金融機構都會跟隨美國的決策，參與制裁

龐佩奧將所有中字頭的機構標上“黨務機構”的帽子，並不利於美國利用金融勢力在中國發展業務，或者干涉中國的決策

還有把間諜飛機偽裝成民航飛機，直接飛入中國領空，這種沒有意義的挑釁行為

只能說方向是對的，手段太粗糙

他对我们而言始终只是一个外国人 新的自由中国不见得不会和美国摩擦冲突 不要什么事都把美国当灯塔和保姆

不能相信西方这些科技公司的安全保证。他们这些人从小生活在蜜罐里，认为盗取隐私偷机密文件是很少发生的事情，极度不道德，所以对这些文件的管理很松懈。

像推特被喝茶，低价值反贼很可能就是推特内部泄露隐私文件给国安，然后配合国安搞几个登录故障需要短信确认从而固定登录人，所以一定要小心，少说话。中国人里愿意当走狗当密探非常多，而大多数西方人总认为人不能卑鄙下流到如此没底线，所以，像谷歌，脸书，推特，电报这些私人公司保密工作应该是松垮的，是依靠法律进行。所以，一定要小心，多看少说话，因为你不知道他们后台有多少个走狗在等着吃人血馒头。

别理姨劣，不值一驳。估计没那么复杂。 无非反串与跟风这两种。

反串的是为了转移注意力。（制度或文化之类的观点分歧，莫名奇妙地指向了生理基因） 跟风的纯粹为了吸引眼球。

为什么该getoutofchina的是布尔什维克，不是我们中国人? 我听到过的最荒唐的说法，可能就是马克思的前世是中国人。 （如果马提倡无私，就可以认为他的前世是朱熹，存天理灭人欲，那他也是个中华文化罪人的转世。 本该是天人合一，甚至天人本一，不是对立的。 虽然朱熹的本意可能是想要皇帝们克制欲望，没想到反而被皇帝老儿们利用来制造驯服工具了） 所谓除了中国人，都是外国人，中外有别。这种区别主要不在于饮食或汉服。 更重要得多的是，真正的中国人在怎么看（世界与人生）这件事上，与许许多多外国人，包括德国犹太人，是截然相反的。 我在别处说过，人都是差不多的，与其检讨人种不如检讨文化。 中国文化的根本（或精髓）在于不假外求，从容不迫，甚至自在逍遥。 人所面对的也基本一样，但在怎么面对（或面对的是什么）这件事上，中外正好相反。 外国人，包括马列恩斯毛，也包括他们政治上的对立面，首先贴了个标签“外”，或外部世界， 面对个外在的宇宙，看什么都是所谓的资源，要斗争，要抢夺，要利用，要开拓，要殖民，等等等等。（信的也往往是个外在的神灵）（这是有了个自我，而又找不到自己究竟是什么，从而发疯去攀援的表现。） 中国人，例如王阳明，贴的是“内”，一切都是心内之物， 这心不是指心脏，也不是指头脑或思维，比较难解释，中国内典虽多，真有体会而不只是口头禅的不多。 简单来讲，就好比是个舞台，人生就是一场戏，一切都是被欣赏的对象，而不是什么有用的东西或无用的垃圾。 （这是觉悟自在自足，从容甚至逍遥的表现） 对于许多自以为是中国人的人来说，首先考虑的就是有用还是没用。 所以我曾说中国早就亡了，不仅亡国，还亡天下。 如要复国或复兴，第一个该getoutofchina的就是共产党 索性说得再过分一点， 既然在我看来，自我意识弱的还没有真正成人， 而不具备建立在我与非我对立之上的审美能力，只能算还是个小动物，甚至野兽， 因此，可以说只有真正的中国人才配叫做人。以流氓习气为荣的土共挺多只能算是外国畜生留下的杂种。 （既然这世上真有支黑，就该有大汉至上主义,以保持平衡） 他认的是外求的外国文化这个爹，不一定俄，也可以是德，甚至英。 如果真以我这标准，与领土有关系吗？甚至与人种都没关系。谁能翻然醒悟，不再外求，谁就是中国人或汉人。这当然只是说着玩的。别太当真。 什么严格？我这严格来讲，就是骂大街，怎么痛快怎么来。 把文化或国家或组织人格化，默认其有统一的意识，本来就是荒唐的，谈何严格？ 他认的是外求的外国文化这个爹。这爹死了？到处都是。这爹早就全球化了。包括中国，早就全盘外化了。

自从圆明居士雍正编禅宗语录，中国文人就别想再龙场悟道了。都忙着考据去了。

（这个局面在明朝学辽金元打大臣屁股，摧折其自尊时就几乎已经注定了。） 现在哪里还有多少从容的风度？

（因为自性自足，不假外求，所以从容不迫。）

只有装腔作势，色厉内荏。

中国文化的精华是不假外求，从容不迫。 早就断绝了。 糟粕主要是一贯的两面派。说一套做一套。 以前是外儒内法。现在是台上为人民服务，台下莫非党碗，党恩浩荡。 底下人没觉得不对，好像很自然。几千年了。早习惯了。 既然“这个局面在明朝学辽金元打大臣屁股，摧折其自尊时就几乎已经注定了。”，当然不是雍正一人之过。

我承认我大汉族主义，甚至讨厌满清的服饰，最近发现都有生理反应，真要吐了，大概我是过分了。

但小毛说得对，不会无缘无故的。

只举一例，满清直到末年才允许有老字号，以前全是made by 康熙， 雍正制，乾隆制 乾隆到处留爪印，“我的”“我的”“我的”，mine,mine,mine, 损了多少文物。

朱元璋也很糟，从他开始，科举就没多大意义了，选出来的政务官原则上并没有制定政策的份，属于秘书，顶多智囊，还是事务官，小吏而已。皇帝太小，张居正才有机会。

大有为的英明君主们，为了证明自己不是吃干饭的，常常破坏制度，远在汉武帝时，就在相权及兵部外另立大将军大司马。习也搞了许多制度外小组，自任组长。 早就亡天下了。只是汉字还在，（庄子坛经传习录还在），没有亡得一点不剩而已。

书虽在，奈何大多都把国学当成与己无关的一个学问，一个饭碗，一个谈资，没有切身的体会。

孔学，再次被统治者歪曲，从弟子规这种糟粕里是学不到自尊自信、自在从容的，只有驯服而已。

马列教当然不等于中国。

外儒内法也绝非中国文明的全部。

中国，如此发展，最后顶多徒留汉服之类的躯壳而已。（里面罩着些高度发达的科技人，机器人，工具人） （国学学什么？）中国文化的精髓：不假外求。 大学之道在明明德。（不在穷经皓首） 为道日损。（不在积累学问，更不要说文凭了） 三藏十二部经，自性中本就具有（先有自性，再有佛典，而不是相反） 这与一味向外追求（认定有个外在的神圣或客观规律以及物质世界）的西方传统是正好相反的。 举个例子。 有些谈禅宗的英文书，开篇就谈什么不是空碗难装茶之类的比喻， 一副要人谦卑听圣训的一神教做派， 南辕北辙，背道而驰，还谈什么禅？ 中国禅，其实不是禅，不是什么思维修，不是印度禅搞的静坐冥想。 不在思维或身体上下功夫， 而是直截了当，问你：谁在思维？谁在赶身体这架牛车？ 但不会有个标准答案来背诵。 学中国文化，要落在实处。这实处不是文字语言，而是我们各自的生命实践。

小毛小习不过就是自觉不自觉地沿袭几千年的外道德内军法，换汤（共产修养代儒家）不换药（军法控制一切）。 在继承糟粕方面做得很好。在断绝精华方面也不输满清。反华分子是应该好好表扬他们。

中国文化的精华是不假外求，从容不迫。 早就断绝了。 糟粕主要是一贯的两面派。说一套做一套。 以前是外儒内法。现在是台上为人民服务，台下莫非党碗，党恩浩荡。 底下人没觉得不对，好像很自然。几千年了。早习惯了。 所谓西方现代文明，也有两面。 一面强调标准化系统化工业化机械化，乃至全球化，大家喝一样的可乐穿一样的T恤，单调乏味。 还有一面强调分工协作，靠市场调节，各自发挥特长。

前者有军事化（海盗）抢资源的传统。（关于无视能量守恒的丛林法则，吐槽过太多了，不再重复） 后者主要体现在软件上，而不是高楼大厦航母高铁。（如果办个事还要求爷爷告奶奶，那离所谓的现代化还远。）

为什么从毛到习有吸收糟粕继承劣根的体质呢？ 因为他们实际都是实用主义者，（又不肯老实承认自己不信自己宣扬的那一套），怎么利于自己掌权，怎么能安慰自己是有实力的，就怎么做。自卑（以至于靠排场撑）就是这二人共通的原罪。

这一篇纯属吐槽，不是学术。

(公平地讲，毛并非一无是处，客观上无意间他曾经启发一部分中国人的怀疑甚至造反的思想。只是现在的粉红或毛粉已经没有这个精神了。在我看来，就是白学了毛思想。）

也许中国的确需要一场文化革命，不是斗私，而是批判道德至上、修身至上。 （其实道德至上问题不大，修身修养万能就很糟糕了）这是一种实际的需要，不是与你的生活无关的。 例如，目前，外资撤逃，市场信心不足。 为什么疑心大于信心，因为越来越黑箱了。 为什么不能公开透明，因为无法自己赦免自己。 什么时候中国人才能认为忠奸善恶不重要，真假更重要？ 只要能立新闻法，就允许他们自己赦免自己。 真看到实情了，会不会实在气不过，就不允许了？ 厚黑学，误以为无耻就无敌，也是对道德修养万能的一种迷信，反向操作而已。 这种文化太深厚了，都成为不自觉地潜意识了。 如果文化不革命，光换人做是没用的，李洪志之流显然也是一路货，甚至在这方面陷得更深。 其实我也一样，一说土共就是流氓，一说西方就是强盗，全是道德审判。 习不是一个人，一个人又不是元婴老怪，怎么一人独裁？ 小毛搞文化革命是对的，但是搞错了方向，反而加深了修身斗私这个糟糕的传统。 还不如强调”求真务实“一类的口号。 这说明他的注意力不在文化，而在革命斗争，要斗倒对立面而已，实在是个太没出息的所谓红太阳。 只知道所谓的实用或实利是相当肤浅的。 难道不应该首先审视一下何为利益？你为何判断其的确是，不会错的，就是利益？ 我认为这种判断对于我们中国人中的大多数来说的确是常常出于各自的道德，（也包括自鸣得意的反道德，好像真占了便宜似的。）

道德的重要是与我们的终极关怀相关的。（其实道德至上问题不大，修身修养万能就很糟糕了）

不过对于比较年轻的中国人来说，希腊文化求真的影响也是有的。 两种文化在新中国新文化中都有。（两者都是入世的，比较亲和。中华偏内在，希腊偏外在，还可以互补。

至于能不能融入同是出世的一神教与印度文化，我估计后者因为与中华同是偏内在的比较容易，

前者就难了，似乎只有易经里有商朝遗留的天命决定一起的观念。但是，如果一切选择都是算出来的，谈何道德？所以易经其实未必在中国文化里有多高的地位，常常只是被借来做修辞而已。）

总之， 当我们在谈是非对错时，我们是在谈真假虚实吗？还是在谈善恶好坏，美丑忠奸？ 我们每一个中国人都该好好问一问自己？ 例如，为什么你认为暴力冲塔一定就是对的？

又例如，为什么你明白知道是假话，还要附和，还要配合，甚至还要为他鼓吹， 就因为你还认他是与你一个立场，一个阵营，忠奸最重要，真假无所谓？

中国传统文化想细谈的话，是很复杂很微妙的， 例如有人说谦受益满招损是因为阴极而阳，阳极而阴，这是用易理论证自己的道德选择， 但是如果你的道德选择是出于一种算计，而不是恻隐之心这类良知，但就是一种虚伪的巧言令色，更谈不上浩然正气。 所以我说”放下易吧，还不如多读庄子“ 技术就是道德？有力量就是合法性？ 再快的刀也不可能是最厉害的手。 反过来讲，再稳的手也与刀快不快没关系， (估计武侠迷不会同意上面这句活） 这修炼的不是技术，是对道德的无视，与厚黑学一类，也是对道德修身的迷恋，只是反向操作而已。

有道德，道德水平特别高，不是万能的。 没道德，道德水平特别低，也不是万能的。 无视道德，把自己修炼成无情冷漠的工具或机器，也是感情用事，不然的话，为什么要走这种极端呢？

在我现在看来，四种轴心文化本来并无优劣之分。

如果，我们的自我意识是建立在物像会动会变，而心镜不动不变之上的，（没有时间相，相续相，寿者相，就无从得知这种对比） 那么，对于像与镜的不同取向， 逻辑上，可以分出四种文化。 不知道是偶然还是必然，地球上正好都有过这四种文化。 简而言之，(人人平等，各有一镜，此镜不得见，只见镜中像） 肯定像的入世，否定像的出世，还有个变量，就是猜想镜外来的与猜想镜内在的。 二乘以二等于四。 四种文化： 肯定像并认为镜外来的：古希腊。 肯定像并认为镜内在的：古中华。 否定像并认为镜外来的：亚伯拉罕三兄弟。（旧约是他们的公约数，其中把相续相比喻为引诱夏娃的毒蛇， 就是对人生这个持续的历程持否定的态度。） 否定像并认为镜内在的：古印度。

后来，由于一神文化与古希腊文化的结合中出现了摩登社会， 尤其是卡尔文宗促成的工业革命，迅速拉大了距离， 逼得其他文化不得不设法追赶， 以至于人们误以为有利于所谓现代化的就是优等文化， 其实未必。 在我看来，不过就是各有各的偏执，有的偏执的结合有利于所谓生产力（其实同时也是破坏力）的无节制扩张而已。 未必真是什么天大的好事。甚至有可能是自我意识这个疯病促使生命必然自毁完成热力学赋予的使命的必然。

Comparing to modern civilization which started in Dutch and England, none of others have made more impact to human beings.

Due to it people's personal life seemed having become much better if you care about the sense of body only.

But if I was a Dutchman or Englishman, I would not be very proud.

Think about that song by Pink Floyd, "you are just another brick in the wall."

A civilized society should give talented people more chances

since civilization means more detailed division of jobs.

Otherwise, all of Mozart can do is singing and dancing aroud firepile in the night.

But, modern civiliztion is too focus on being effective and constantly tryin to make people replacable parts of a hugh machine , inclunding a war machine.

In order to adapt to the various war machines and try to be part of them, people are losing the ability to remain independent (especially to think independently) and their talents are diminishing generation after generation. War does not make us better.

People often imagine the environment as a colosseum. The environment chooses those who suit them, not the strong. It is the weak (the simple-minded) who suit their environment (and become part of the war machine).

The Western push for individuality was an illusion and the reality was that the family could not be regulated into a screw or a brick to the detriment of industrialisation.

In the film Shawshank, there is a word called "institutionalisation".

People are divided into different prisons of the mind.

Not only are they used to these walls, but they are born into them, a brick in the wall, and they even enjoy it so much that they are willing to sacrifice everything for words like "glory" (or, ironically, "freedom").

All similar military governing disguised by slogans.

By the way, from my view , the invention of mordern business in Dutch is more important than industry revolution in England.

It has changed the way of oganization.

In traditional society, including Roman or China, including anciet Greece, the society was not based on a buch of total stangers, which means the potential to expand unlimitedly,

including a power which be called as production capacity by Maxist,

but acutally also a destroying capacity.

Mordern people can easily move for one company to company , it seems kind of a freedom.

But what the cost?

都是现代社会，都差不多，就好比各地的麦当劳。 而差别，最重要的未必是投票比例或搬家自由度。而是法律或公约，包括潜规则究竟谁定的，越接近公约，越背离军法，越合理，越名正言顺，这才是拜登最该讲的，不是什么民主vs独裁。如今的世界危机四伏，人们为什么一定要反独裁？美国法律也不健全，据说本该cdc管的归各州州长了。所以关键是该独裁时谁在独裁，他懂这危机是什么吗？是他揽权的机会？

检讨人种不如检讨文化。检讨文化不如检讨制度。 以我看，人都是差不多的。中国人身上我最讨厌的，诸如势利眼，狗眼看人低，气人有笑人无，趋炎附势，嫉贤妒能，等等，别国人身上也有，只是比较懂得掩饰而已。 白人那种屈尊式的礼貌，正能量的互夸，等等，也是挺可笑的。

不如检讨文化。例如明显缺乏自尊自信。 （建立在制度或文化上的，我背靠了大树所以我很自信，也是在提供笑料。） 所谓自信，哪有建立在信组织或信社会之上的，这是一种反讽吗？手握笔杆子，枪杆子心里不慌？牺牲做了笔杆子刀把子很自豪？

没有自尊，何来自信？ 关于如何建立自尊，早已谈过，不再重复。 简单总结，关键在所谓“自己”究竟是什么。肯定不是党组织或英明领袖。也不是外在的上帝或不需要人的逻辑真理。。

检讨人种不如检讨文化。检讨文化不如检讨制度。 现代制度各个国家其实也差不多。毛病也一样，主要就是没有认真反垄断。甚至政府自己搞垄断。 垄断可能难免。但应该要求提供免费服务。包括国营事业。估计垄断的热情就大幅下降了。 （人都是差不多的。日本人出生在日本文化中，被要求克制几乎成了习惯， 一旦到了中国，还是有解放自己原形毕露的。还有欧洲人，到了中国常常发现太好了，随便穿马路扔垃圾大声说活，都不想走了。）

英美，尤其是美国或拉美，与中国文化，差别没有日本那么大，也是很随便的。

留学，常常还是在象牙塔里，不容易真的全面。例如王小波，不知道asshole不是傻而是混，可见他在美国日常交流的都不是普通人。

品葱上还是有三观正常且有水平的知识分子的，不过他们比较谦虚，不会一直跳出来情绪发泄，也只活跃在自己比较有经验的领域话题之下，所以你很少看见他们，在品葱想看有深度的内容可以多逛逛。

推特更加鱼龙混杂。

蓬佩奥干的漂亮

过于注重道德，压抑人性，物极必反，中国文化有够弱智的，统治者为了自己现世统治不惜用愚民教育

科学研究的是电视剧剧情背后的逻辑。 宗教是对电视机原理的想象，体现了人们的愿望，愿意相信这原理，不用任何证明，也无法证明，本来就是不可知的。

They are in two total different, even opposite territories, so, science have never proved and can never prove religion.

Let me draw an analogy.

By studying tv drama, we can know nothing about how the television work,

those who get a glimpse of other channel don't know about it better than you either.

The First Cause is unnamable,

It is as if we are living within a serialized television drama.

Science studies the logic behind the development of the drama, including the drama of the so-called evolution of nature.

Religion is the imagination of the principle of the television set (the stage of the drama) and embodies the wishes of people.

They want to believe in some imagining of an ultimate principle of this stage/Tv.

It doesn't matter that there is no proof, because they want to believe it.

Nor can it be proved, because this ultimate mystery is inherently unknowable.

The creator (author) could be typing at random. We just happen to be living in a readable novel in which logic seems to be at work, but not really, and it is the typer who creates all the illusions that is really at work.

It doesn't matter who the author is. (It is the eternal ultimate question and secret, hidden not only behind all that we sense, but also by all the concepts we imagine, including the Tao, God and emptiness.

One might think that the creator (the author) is so important that all meaning depends on him. But is the meaning of an author complete if he has no readers, especially the author of a detective novel? You might even ask: does he really have any meaning, no matter how big he is, how long he lives, or how great he is in any way?

I asked my son the other day, when he was a little boy, "Is the sky blue?" ." No, at night it's black." He's clever." If there was a superman whose eyes could and always did see infrared or ultraviolet light, would the sky be blue or black for him?" Without the eyes of life, colour means nothing to the sky.

Why should we doubt the meaning of life, why should we not doubt the meaning of the universe, or even the meaning of the creator. No matter how small we may be, no matter how short our lives may be.

The meaning of life is to admire this process from birth to death.

At the beginning, as a child we can only taste sweet,

we reject all the bitterness.

After growing, we may have a cup of coffee or tea everyday.

If this world is kind of paradise, it would be boring eventually.

If there is an author who is being called by someones as God,

then we, the readers are the ones who fullfill his purpose.

I don't think his work is just as simple as a fairy tale or a simple war story between two sides.

Since there are so many people keep think shallowly, not good must evil, not rich must loser,

I feel it is unfortunate for human being to have so many tools of high techonology, just like a boy playing huge knife.

估计没那么复杂。 无非反串与跟风这两种。

反串的是为了转移注意力。（制度或文化之类的观点分歧，莫名奇妙地指向了生理基因） 跟风的纯粹为了吸引眼球。

傳北京監控蕭美琴訪布拉格險釀車禍 成捷中外交事件

2024-04-06 03:38 聯合報／ 記者 張文馨 ／華盛頓即時報導

捷克智庫歐洲價值安全政策中心主任楊雅譽（Jakub Janda）在X平台轉發一則捷克媒體報導，指中國大陸軍事外交官在布拉格騷擾來訪的中華民國副總統當選人蕭美琴，報導指，為尾隨蕭美琴，中方人士闖紅燈差點引發車禍；捷克外交部正考慮驅逐此人。

楊雅譽引述當地媒體Seznam Zpravy的報導，指蕭美琴3月中旬應捷克參議院議長邀請訪問布拉格，受到捷克警察保護局維安保護的蕭美琴，在從布拉格機場前往市中心的路上，遭一輛汽車尾隨，這輛可疑的汽車闖紅燈，差點造成車禍，捷克警方攔下後發現，駕駛是中國大陸駐布拉格大使館軍事部門的外交官；此外，北京的跟監一路持續到蕭美琴抵達下榻飯店。

報導為捷克文，楊雅譽在X平台更新進度指，捷克外交部已召見中方大使，捷克外交部指「這件事還沒結束」，正在考慮將中方涉案人列為不受歡迎人士（persona non grata）。通常在外交上被列為不受歡迎人士者，就會被驅逐出境。

此外，楊雅譽寫道，捷克參議院外交委員會主席費雪（Pavel Fischer）呼籲「驅逐這個流氓」，呼籲捷克政府驅逐這個公然違反維也納和約的中方軍事外交官。

費雪表示，一個中方外交官危險駕駛民用汽車遭攔下，卻拿出他的外交護照讓捷克警方檢查，這是醜聞；「我認為，一個有外交身分的中國人危及我們當地的交通安全，並危及我們尊貴客人的安全，這點是無法接受的。」

根據Chat GPT翻譯報導紀要，捷克警方注意到有人在監視蕭美琴一行，這部可疑車輛闖過一個剛轉變為紅燈的路口，差點引發車禍；這個駕駛持中華人民共和國外交護照，向警方表明身分，並宣稱自己只是到附近餐廳吃飯，否認跟蹤任何人。

常有人诟病中国人缺乏终极关怀，对于生死这件大事往往只有忌讳而已。 人们更愿意关心所谓有用的事情，例如股票走势。 待到无法回避时，只能到习俗中自欺欺人，好像自己真相信烧纸钱的功用似的。 这些是现代中国的一些现象，在中华传统中并非如此。 我同意学者金观涛的观点，四大轴心对于所谓的终极问题，各有各的回答。 正好覆盖了逻辑上四种可能有的答案。 向外而出世的一神文化，否定这个世界，重点在救赎。（外力解脱） 向外而入世的希腊传统，肯定这个世界，要参与，但比较慎重，重点在真理。 向内而出世的印度文化，否定眼前的画面，重点在（自力）解脱。 向内而入世的中华传统，看不下去，要入世。重点在（仁义）道德。 （简单而言：儒家舍身取义，求仁得仁。道家齐物齐生死，看淡生死，视死如归。禅门好事坏事都不做，悬崖撒手，舍生忘死。） 这只是大略的概括，实际情况要复杂得多，更何况四大文化还有波斯的二元对立等其他文化之间还有不少交流乃至融合。 在一神文化与希腊传统的融合中，更产生了所谓的现代文明，席卷全球，几乎影响了整个世界。 中国也不能例外，于是出现了所谓人心不古，道德败坏的现象。 其实这是相当表面的，几千年的积累怎么可能一个五四，一个文革，就荡然无存了？ 别看厚黑学盛行，其实也是迷信道德修身是万能的，只是反向操作而已。 一直放不下无私无我的初心，总想着狠斗心念，也只是古人的灭人欲的滥觞而已。 要具体分析阐述，我还可以写很多。 但我不是什么学者，这些不该是我的business. 算了。对感兴趣的朋友再次推荐金观涛的著作。不是很感兴趣的估计读不下去，不够有趣，不够通俗。

在美国，很多年轻人也只能翻汉堡或者去沃尔玛亚马逊仓库搬砖

全网第一张阿篱的大字报和虫文门评论员的评论，写得何等好呵！请同志们重读这一张大字报和这个评论。可是在50多天里，从47小管家到老用户的某些管理员同志，却反其道而行之，站在反动的权限狗立场上，实行权限狗专政，将鸟虫钢篱瑞轰轰烈烈的文化大革命运动打下去，颠倒是非，混淆黑白，围剿革命派，压制不同意见，实行删帖封号，自以为得意，长权限狗的威风，灭革命派的志气，又何其毒也！联想到1962年的品葱和1964年膜乎大哥的错误倾向，岂不是可以发人深醒的吗？

权限狗的黑手伸到哪里，哪里的垃圾贴就泛滥成灾

Whatever

台湾

长期追踪低薪数据的文化大学劳动暨人力资源系教授李健鸿对记者表示，台湾自2018年起低薪劳工每年减少，但是结构不变，低薪劳工当中每年都约有35%为30岁以下人士，他们的行业分布有六成是从事服务业，其中28%在住宿及餐饮业，25%在批发及零售业——这两大行业都是台湾最低薪的产业。

因为入行门槛较低，大学生毕业生有高达七成半的人会进入服务业，之后就难以摆脱低薪魔咒。

印度

耶鲁大学的研究人员发现，在印度和撒哈拉以南非洲的几个国家，从事农业的人跨越到消费者服务行业后提高了他们自己的生产力和收入。但这里面有一个隐藏的问题：收入的分布“极其不平等”，而且富人不成比例地受益。

2047会竭尽全力避免神经病捣乱。

3。

一群红卫兵冒充啥中央文革小组

C

军事法庭：小共匪刘胡兰在战区对国军和国府下属机构恐怖袭击，判处小共匪刘胡兰强迫劳动，抓去参加劳动军。

这个是最合理的处理方法。

政治正确的话，她这个够不上hate speech，顶多删贴封号，外加apology,不至于社区服务

我们这里也是精神病院，我是主治大夫

最近那位朋友 https://2047.one/member/blackout

很明显有bipolar disorder

乳gay了，在政治太正确的政治环境的国家，她估计也要吃个缓刑。

看她具体做了什么吧。

1.是正义的，乱世用重典。

2.我中立，但是当时世界上并没有限制处死内战中参加交战的童兵。

3.不是正义的，流程潦草且违反中华民国当时的法律。

大家还有兴趣登录吗？

碎

https://web.archive.org/web/20240404162944/https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8664/7875880?form=udn_ch2_common3_cate

伟大的无产阶级文化大革命在以毛主席为代表的无产阶级革命路线的指引下，几个月来所开展的批判资产阶级反动路线的群众运动，已经取得了极大的胜利。我们在胜利的战歌声中，跨进了一九六七年。《人民日报》《红旗》杂志元旦社论指出：“一九六七年，将是全国全面展开阶级斗争的一年。一九六七年，将是无产阶级联合其他革命群众，向党内一小撮走资本主义道路的当权派和社会上的牛鬼蛇神，展开总攻击的一年。一九六七年，将是更加深入地批判资产阶级反动路线，清除它的影响的一年。一九六七年，将是一斗、二批、三改取得决定性的胜利的一年。”也就是说，一九六七年将是资产阶级反动路线全线崩溃彻底瓦解的一年，将是无产阶级文化大革命取得决定性的伟大胜利的一年。

上海市广大革命群众，在批判上海地区党内一小撮人所执行的资产阶级反动路线的斗争中，也取得了初步的胜利，并进入了一个更深入、更广阔的新阶段。 我们上海市工厂的无产阶级文化大革命群众运动，正以排山倒海之势，雷霆万钧之力，冲破一切阻力，汹涌澎湃地向前发展。我们革命造反派的工人，最听毛主席的话，坚决执行毛主席亲自提出的“抓革命，促生产”的方针。毛主席教导我们：“政治工作是一切经济工作的生命线。”我们革命造反派深深地懂得：不搞好无产阶级文化大革命，我们的生产就会迷失方向，就会滑到资本主义的方向上去。我们在无产阶级文化大革命中所亲身经历的事实越来越多地证明：只有无产阶级文化大革命搞好了，生产才会有更大的发展。把文化大革命同发展生产对立起来的看法，是错误的。

可是，党内一小撮走资本主义道路的当权派和顽固地坚持资产阶级反动路线的人十分仇视无产阶级文化大革命，他们千方百计地对抗毛主席提出的“抓革命，促生产”的方针。他们的阴谋手段大致表现如下：

运动初期，他们以“抓生产”为名，来压制革命，反对抓革命。我们革命造反派的工人要起来革命，要批判资产阶级反动路线，他们就以生产任务压工人，给我们扣上“破坏生产”的大帽子。他们是真的要“抓生产”吗？不是的，他们是为了保他们自己的乌纱帽，企图阻挠我们革命。我们戳穿了他们的阴谋诡计，勇敢地起来造反了。 于是，他们又抛出了另一种花招，以极“左”的面目，以漂亮的革命词句，煽动大批被他们蒙蔽的工人赤卫队队员借口北上“告状”为名，破坏生产，破坏交通运输，以达到他们破坏无产阶级文化大革命，破坏无产阶级专政的目的。最近，更有一小撮反动的家伙在阴谋策划停水、停电、停交通。对这样一些反动的家伙，我们一定要把他们揪出来，实行无产阶级专政，严加惩办，决不能让他们的罪恶阴谋得逞。

革命的工人同志们！紧急行动起来！坚决执行毛主席提出的“抓革命，促生产”的方针！我们革命造反派的工人要成为“抓革命，促生产”的模范。我们不但要做抓革命的先锋和骨干，而且也要做促生产的先锋和骨干。我们上海是一个全国最大的工业生产城市，它在国家的整个经济生活中起着极其重大的作用。但是，最近在很多工厂中出现部分或者大部分的赤卫队员停止生产、离开生产岗位的现象，这就直接违反了中央关于抓革命、促生产的规定，直接影响了人民的生活和国民经济建设的发展。我们的革命造反派工人牢记着毛主席的教导，顶着这股逆流，发挥了高度的革命负责精神，在极其困难的条件下，顶起了全厂的生产，有力地打击了党内一小撮走资本主义道路的当权派，粉碎了他们企图用破坏生产来打击革命的大阴谋。这样做得对！做得好！我们全体革命造反派的同志，都要向他们学习。毛主席教导我们：“凡是敌人反对的，我们就要拥护；凡是敌人拥护的，我们就要反对。”我们革命造反派工人有志气，有决心，有力量，一定能把革命和生产搞得更好，实现毛主席提出的“抓革命，促生产”的伟大号召。

工人赤卫队的广大的要革命的阶级兄弟们！“抓革命，促生产”是毛主席提出的方针，是党中央一再强调的方针，是保证无产阶级文化大革命进行到底的重要方针。拥护不拥护、执行不执行这个方针是一个原则问题，大是大非问题。你们受他们煽动而离开生产岗位，究竟是对谁有利呢？你们这样做到底是使谁高兴、使谁心痛呢？我们希望你们要听毛主席的话，在这个重大原则问题上，一定要擦亮眼睛，明辨是非，不要再受骗了，赶快觉悟过来，回到生产岗位上来，回到无产阶级革命路线上来。我们革命造反派的同志们一定会热情地欢迎你们回来，和我们共同革命，共同搞好生产，我们一定不会责怪你们，因为我们都是阶级亲兄弟，因为你们中绝大部分是受资产阶级反动路线毒害的人，是受党内走资本主义道路当权派和顽固地执行资产阶级反动路线的人蒙蔽的革命群众。

全市一切革命学生和革命的机关干部们！让我们和广大革命工人紧紧结合在一起，为了坚决贯彻执行毛主席提出的“抓革命，促生产”的方针，广泛地开展宣传和斗争，更坚决地向资产阶级反动路线猛烈开火，打垮资产阶级反动路线的一切新反扑，将工厂的无产阶级文化大革命推向一个新高潮！

在伟大的毛泽东思想无限光芒照耀下，展望未来，革命前程灿烂辉煌。我们工人阶级、贫下中农、一切劳动者同革命学生、革命知识分子、革命干部联合起来，共同努力，并肩战斗，乘胜前进，把无产阶级文化大革命进行到底！

伟大的无产阶级文化大革命万岁！

我们心中的红太阳、最最伟大的领袖毛主席万岁！万岁！万万岁！

上海工人革命造反总司令部

红卫兵上海市大专院校革命委员会（红革会）

上海市反到底联络总部

上海新闻界革命造反委员会

上海市炮打司令部联合兵团

同济大学东方红兵团

上海交通大学反到底兵团

首都第三司令部驻沪联络站

北京航空学院红旗战斗队驻沪联络站

哈尔滨军事工程学院红色造反团驻沪联络站

西安军事电讯工程学院文革临委会驻沪联络站

一九六七年一月四日

关于生死这个终极问题，这世界上有过大概四大一小五个传统， 并不都仅仅是关于信仰的。 （待续）

关于生死

这据说是甘地的名言。（不是原文，不记得原文了） 有趣的是，他的确常常把自杀当成手段。

看成了hanging yourself

Comparing to modern civilization which started in Dutch and England, none of others have made more impact to human beings.

Due to it people's personal life seemed having become much better if you care about the sense of body only.

But if I was a Dutchman or Englishman, I would not be very proud.

Think about that song by Pink Floyd, "you are just another brick in the wall."

A civilized society should give talented people more chances,

since civilization means more detailed division of jobs.

Otherwise, all of Mozart can do is singing and dancing aroud firepile in the night.

But, modern civiliztion is too focus on being effective and constantly tryin to make people replacable parts of a hugh machine , inclunding a war machine.

In order to adapt to the various war machines and try to be part of them, people are losing the ability to remain independent (especially to think independently) and their talents are diminishing generation after generation. War does not make us better.

People often imagine the environment as a colosseum. The environment chooses those who suit them, not the strong. It is the weak (the simple-minded) who suit their environment (and become part of the war machine).

The Western push for individuality was an illusion and the reality was that the family could not be regulated into a screw or a brick to the detriment of industrialisation.

In the film Shawshank, there is a word called "institutionalisation".

People are divided into different prisons of the mind.

Not only are they used to these walls, but they are born into them, a brick in the wall, and they even enjoy it so much that they are willing to sacrifice everything for words like "glory" (or, ironically, "freedom").

All similar military governing disguised by slogans.

Since there are so many people keep thinking shallowly, not good must evil, not rich must loser,

I feel it is unfortunate for human being to have so many tools of high techonology, just like a boy playing huge knife.

By the way, from my view , the invention of modern business in Dutch is more important than industry revolution in England.

It has changed the way of organization.

In traditional society, including Roman or China, including anciet Greece, the society was not based on a buch of total stangers, which means the potential to expand unlimitedly,

including a power which be called as production capacity by Maxist,

but acutally also a destroying capacity to the nature.

Modern people can easily move for one company to company , it seems kind of a freedom.

But what the cost?

It seems hardly anyone questions the logic in "The Avengers' Infinite War" or "The Three Bodies", even though they have been taught the law of conservation of energy separately in school.

—————————————————————————————————————-

Most people look forward to world war 3 unconsciously.

This is because they have been educated in a different (but practically identical) system of war preparation, where fighting for resources is unquestionable.

For example, hardly anyone questions the logic in "The Avengers' Infinite War" or "The Three Bodies", even though they have been taught the law of conservation of energy separately in school.

One would think they could use a war to settle the ultimate choice between faiths. (At first it seemed like other issues, such as "who deserve all sorts of resources")

If the law of conservation of energy is correct.

No energy gets consumed, it just keeps shifting or transferring between different forms.

So, much science fiction is wrong.

The speed (kinetic energy) of anything (such as a spacecraft) can never be escalated infinitely.

That's why the speed of light seems to be the same for all.

In a way, we can say that life is also a form of energy.

Therefore, there is a limit to the number of any species.

There is no need for any war to reduce the population for fearing that there will not be enough energy to consume.

War is not that great at all.

In order to adapt to the various war machines and try to be part of them, people are losing the ability to remain independent (especially to think independently) and their talents are diminishing generation after generation. War does not make us better.

People often imagine the environment as a colosseum. The environment chooses those who suit them, not the strong. It is the weak (the simple-minded) who suit their environment (and become part of the war machine).

The Western push for individuality was an illusion and the reality was that the family could not be regulated into a screw or a brick to the detriment of industrialisation.

In the film Shawshank, there is a word called "institutionalisation".

People are divided into different prisons of the mind.

Not only are they used to these walls, but they are born into them, a brick in the wall, and they even enjoy it so much that they are willing to sacrifice everything for words like "glory" (or, ironically, "freedom").

All similar military governing disguised by slogans. slogan sounds different, the system is same. that's how 1% rule 99%. The ability of acting is most useful, people actually buy it.

If people keep ignoring their inner loss of themselves and unconsciously clinging to various images (e.g. the body) or concepts (e.g. the Holy names), World War III and the end of the world is inevitable, and it may have already begun in Europe in the conflict near the borders of Catholicism and Orthodoxy.

Any world will eventually be ended. This does not matter. For, life is an energy which will be recycled, which means that after the death of a life or an entire world there will be a new world.

But it is a shame that such a beautiful world like Earth is being ended in a war of names/concepts. What can we do to prepare for it? We should do our best to stop it.

Be aware of all kinds of slogans.

The First Cause is unnamable,

because if there is a God, he would not need an agent,

he probably accept those people who consider themselves as his agent to call him as a God.

But he is not just a God.

He is who behind everything, it means he is the ultimate secret always concealed by all of these things, including all kinds of holy names.

We’d better admit our ignorance, be more humble,

don't fight any war in the name of God or Tao, or Freedom, Glory, or any Country's name.

The meaning of life is to admire this process from birth to death.

At the beginning, as a child we can only taste sweet,

we reject all the bitterness.

After growing, we may have a cup of coffee or tea everyday.

If this world is kind of paradise, it would be boring eventually.

If there is an author who is being called by someones as God,

then we, the readers are the ones who fullfill his purpose.

I don't think his work is just as simple as a fairy tale or a simple war story between two sides.

Since there are so many people keep think shallowly, not good must evil, not rich must loser,

I feel it is unfortunate for human being to have so many tools of high techonology, just like a boy playing huge knife.

———————————————————————————————————-

The First Cause is unnamable,

because if there is a God, he would not need an agent,

he probably accept those people who consider themselves as his agent to call him as a God.

But he is not just a God.

He is who behind everything, it means he is the ultimate secret always concealed by all of these things, including all kinds of holy names.

We’d better admit our ignorance, be more humble,

don't fight any war in the name of God or Tao, or Freedom, Glory, or any Country's name.

Be aware of the various slogans, including "freedom first" "my country first" "me first" "xxx(whatever it is ) first" "weeds rock the world" "we deserve it, let it end".

Why do we have to follow any of them or any other supposed prophecy?

(We are just bricks on different walls, when in fact the walls are the same).

Eve did not lie, there was a serpent, which is an allegory that talks about a sense of continuity such as time or memory. Without such feelings, there are no conditions for the formation of self-awareness or self-knowledge. (This allegory is not so good because self-awareness is not so bad as a snake, without self-knowledge, who can admire the beauty of our worlds, even a God has to come to earth for a birth in our world to understand the most beautiful things in our world: the human joys and even sadness.)

Humans are the most complex animals on the planet. If your body is too simple to perceive your environment clearly, you will find it difficult to perceive the movement and change of everything in front of you.

Without sensing moving or changing images, it is difficult to form the concept or idea of a mirror/screen/stage/platform (self-awareness or self-knowledge), which is often referred to as the ego.

The opposition of what can sense and what is sensed, the opposition of mirror image, the opposition of I and non-I, is called objectified thinking，which is growing up with self-knowledge,

both of which end up trapping us into a dilemma. Either be a miserable sensitive person or a happy ignorant beast. This is why drugs are everywhere(including digital ones and “spiritual” ones) .

Every pair of eyes is different, and we see ourselves differently from how others see us. This is why we feel alone.

The reflection of light takes time.

So we can never see us in the mirror as we are now, all we see is history. You have changed.

If the change is so rapid and you are so sensitive that you suddenly find a face in the mirror that seems to be a stranger whose facial expression does not match your current emotions, you too may go crazy.

Somehow we all lose ourselves.

Clinging to any attachment (including concepts) such as the body, mind, thoughtless states, spiritual experiences, the Tao, God, Śūnyatā, etc., ........ that can never satisfy our desire to find the true Self or the real us. For they are all like images in a mirror, television set or other stage or platform. What we really desire is the 'mirror' and not 'any image', so how can we be satisfied?

You don't have to do anything but realise that the real you or the true self is there all the time.

It's like you're looking for a horse on the back of a horse. Once you realise that you have been riding it from the beginning (or before the beginning) you will immediately stop looking.

Yet within every yang is always a yin, and every belief/hope is based on doubt/fear.

If you are already 100% sure of something, there is no need of a belief.

So the real ultimate war between light and darkness is within us, not outside.

The creator (author) could be a monkey who is typing at random. We just happen to be living in a readable novel in which logic seems to be at work, but not really, and it is the monkey who creates all the illusions that is really at work.

It doesn't matter who the author is. (It is the eternal ultimate question and secret, hidden not only behind all that we sense, but also by all the concepts we imagine, including the Tao, God and emptiness.

One might think that the creator (the author) is so important that all meaning depends on him. But is the meaning of an author complete if he has no readers, especially the author of a detective novel? You might even ask: does he really have any meaning, no matter how big he is, how long he lives, or how great he is in any way?

I asked my son the other day, when he was a little boy, "Is the sky blue?" ." No, at night it's black." He's clever." If there was a superman whose eyes could and always did see infrared or ultraviolet light, would the sky be blue or black for him?" Without the eyes of life, colour means nothing to the sky.

Why should we doubt the meaning of life, why should we not doubt the meaning of the universe, or even the meaning of the creator. No matter how small we may be, no matter how short our lives may be.

There is a word those people who see themselves as God's agents like to use : humble.

Yet actually we can see their inside arragant in nearly each statement made by them.

So, if you want to change the world by changing yourself,

the first thing you should do is not to change some appearance such as daily behaving, e.g. smiling or hi five,

but to remind yourself your ignorance every morning.

Remember you don't know anything about the God, even if this name God is right or wrong. Why you don't think this title is probably too much simple for him. Why he is not beyond those concept regarding high or low, big or little.

By studying tv drama, we can know nothing about how the television work,

those who get a glimpse of other channel don't know about it better than you either.

The First Cause is unnamable,

because if there is a God, he would not need an agent,

he probably accept those people who consider themselves as his agent to call him as a God.

But he is not just a God.

He is who behind everything, it means he is the ultimate secret always concealed by all of these things, including all kinds of holy names.

We’d better admit our ignorance, be actually humble, not just use this word to decorate yourself.

If everyone can do that, this world would be very different.

People would be more united certainly.

Please think about this: is putting faith in God and following those words which was not directly form God’s mouth are the same thing?

And since He is behind all of it, is it necessary for him to speak to you directly or indirectly?

Is there any possiblity that your arragant make you believe that you are the chosen one who is less ignorant than others?

If you are already 100% sure of something, there is no need of a belief.

So, the real ultimate war between light and darkness is within us, not outside.

Don't hurry to argue, listen first, and ask yourself if there is any question you'd like to learn from your opposite.

这位朋友欢迎接受电脉冲疗法: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/electroconvulsive-therapy/about/pac-20393894

ddd

不是说俄罗斯的核弹保管不善 过期了不能用吗