文章
生活

【The Sociologist】审查相关的著述及一部纪录片

libgen 图书馆革命
libgen  ·  2021年1月10日 天堂应该是图书馆的模样。一个阅读诗歌的人要比不读诗歌的人更难被战胜。创造是一种拯救。创造拯救了创造者本身。

https://t.me/thesoc/406

在康奈尔大学读资讯科学博士的 Andy Zhao,在其 Matters 上自去年 3 月起,对 Annual Review of Political Science 上 Margaret E. Roberts 的 Resilience to Online Censorship (对网络审查不服从的韧性)一文展开翻译,每次更新一个章节,至今更新完毕。随着技术的发展,人们面对专制主义审查的回复力(意识到审查的存在、抵抗的措施和能力、避免分裂极化)似乎越来越弱。去年断断续续,我也不自觉地零星读到许多审查相关的著述,也如 Andy 所作译注中提及的,信息鸿沟在中国大陆背景中也值得注意。下面是过去一年中我所看到的相关材料------

資訊資本主義

Kapczynski, A. (2020). The Law of Informational Capitalism. Yale Law Journal, 129(5), 1460-1515.
The Yale Law Journal 上一篇法律視角的一篇論文,結合兩本著作,一本是 Shoshana Zuboff 的 The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power,另一本是 Julie E. Cohen 的 Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism

Nedzhvetskaya, N. (2019). Brave New (Digital) World: Translating Knowledge into Collective Action - Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (New York, Public Affairs, 2019). European Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 528-533.
(对 Zuboff 的 The Age of Surveillance Capitalism 的另一篇書評)

Bartley, T. (2019). The Digital Surveillance Society. Contemporary Sociology, 48(6), 622--627.
(去年底看到的對四本書的書評。其中第一本是上面的 Zuboff 的書。其他三本為:
1. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press. (LSE Review)
2. Harcourt, B. E. (2015). Exposed: Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age. Harvard University Press.
(Review: Lee, T. (2016). Exposed: Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age by Bernard E. Harcourt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015, 364 pp. $35.00 Hardcover. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(02), 463--465.)
3. Bamberger, K. A., & Mulligan, D. K. (2015). Privacy on the ground: driving corporate behavior in the United States and Europe. MIT Press.

Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2020). To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1736124

You can handle the post-truth: a pocket guide to the surreal internet

Brazil is sliding into techno-authoritarianism

網路審查

Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.
万有引力之虫:\

Roberts, M. E. (2020). Resilience to Online Censorship. Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032837
与审查共存(一):沉默的不服从
与审查共存(二):对信息征税
与审查共存(三):审查还可以产生什么影响?
与审查共存(四):无察觉,不反抗
与审查共存(五):上有对策
与审查共存(六):因人而异的不服从
与审查共存(七):选择性审查的影响
与审查共存(八):未来

Esberg, J. (2020). Censorship as Reward: Evidence from Pop Culture Censorship in Chile. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 821-836.

Keremoğlu, E., & Weidmann, N. B. (2020). How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay. Comparative Political Studies, 0010414020912278.

數字鴻溝

Reisdorf, B. C., Triwibowo, W., & Yankelevich, A. (2020). Laptop or Bust: How Lack of Technology Affects Student Achievement. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220919145

中國的互聯網控制

Creemers, R. (2017). Cyber China: Upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(103), 85-100.

King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326-343.

Huang, H. (2017). A war of (mis) information: The political effects of rumors and rumor rebuttals in an authoritarian country. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 283-311.

King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484-501.

Yang, Y. (2016). The Internet and China's Foreign Policy Decision-making. Chinese Political Science Review, 1(2), 353-372.

Zhang, Y. (2018). The Internet in China: New Methods and Opportunities. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 23(1), 121--133.

Hobbs, W. R., & Roberts, M. E. (2018). How sudden censorship can increase access to information. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 621-636.

Xu, X. (2020). To Repress or to Co-opt? Authoritarian Control in the Age of Digital Surveillance. American Journal of Political Science. doi/10.1111/ajps.12514

威權之下的中國學術研究

Greitens, S. C., & Truex, R. (2019). Repressive Experiences among China Scholars: New Evidence from Survey Data. The China Quarterly, 1-27.

Chinese state censorship of COVID-19 research represents a looming crisis for academic publishers

补充一部讨论互联网审查的工作生产、全球影响、社交媒体加剧冲突等议题的德国纪录片 The Cleaners(原名 Im Schatten der Netzwelt,网络阴影之下)。Hans Block 和 Moritz Riesewieck 执导,他们也在 TED 上 讲述了 关于「数字清洁」(digital cleaning)的问题。不过我第一次看这部纪录片,是在 DW 的 YouTube 频道,分为 两集播出,目前均已失效,原因不明。一部讲述内容被删除的影片,自身却(或被)删除,不论是因著作权还是其他原因都表现出足够的讽刺。Internet Archive 上仍可找到 播出日存档 回看,也可 在此 下载观看。

菜单
  1. natasha 饭姐
    natasha  

    图书馆同学的分享总是有前瞻性。

  2. Ambulance 阿弥陀佛
    Ambulance   夫人必自侮,然後人侮之;家必自毀,而後人毀之;國必自伐,而後人伐之。

    翻译版似乎已经不见了,有空我啃一下原文吧,感谢分享

    The Cleaners这部片子我在YT上看过,今天那些喊着“言论自由”的人们真的应该去看一看,很多事情并不是那么简单的。下架应该是商业版权方面的因素,目前Vimeo上面有收费版:

    https://vimeo.com/ondemand/thecleaners2018

  3. libgen 图书馆革命
    libgen   天堂应该是图书馆的模样。一个阅读诗歌的人要比不读诗歌的人更难被战胜。创造是一种拯救。创造拯救了创造者本身。