文章
人文

随笔(怀疑论与决定论的另类结合)

minjohnz  ·  2022年4月20日 忙于实修。不回复。除非是的确有趣有意思的。如果你很在意我为什么不回复,建议不要写很长的评论。在质疑我的表达力前,请先质疑自己的理解力。

有个电影(《四零五谋杀案》)说得好:一切都会过去,唯有真理永存。 (至于真理到底可全知还是不可全知?连这个问题也有可能是不可知的。至少我不知道。并且,很讨厌地,我认为别人也不知道,因为我偏向“不可确定全知论”。如何确定真地已经全知道了,如何确定真地没有未知了,如何确定真地没有不知道“自己不知道”了? 逻辑上是不可能确定的。却很容易被自己的超能力甚至“极其超能力”给蒙骗了(或被新奇的幻境梦境带偏了)。------怀疑论。 然而,无论可知还是不可知,真理或真相就是真的理、真的相,就在那里,无可动摇,无论人们能不能到达。泰山就是泰山,不会因为没人认识就不成为泰山。)---------决定论。

我们至少可以发现四个真,“觉,不离当下、是真的“”瞬间即永恒、是真的”“我的真情实感、是真的,例如面对死亡时的恐惧”“我是真的(无论找不找得到我究竟在哪里)”

“飞矢不动”,瞬间即永恒。什么都没过去,只是不在眼前而已。

未来,(极大概率)一定会来(未知,假设一定会来),也只是不在眼前而已。

我们的每一个瞬间,镜像不二的当下,都是永恒的真相,无可更改或篡改。所以也不是“就在那里”,而是就在这里,就在眼前,就在当下。只是我主观地认为:彼此达到不了对方的客观真相而已。(其实,各自的真相谁都不可能知道,甚至包括自己)我的主观就是你的客观,你的主观就是我的客观。难免误会,理解不能,终究孤独。 这曾被我称为“自我意识陷阱”

生命(及意识)以及“非生命”(未必没有意识)的本质或许是能量(及被能量点亮的光)。 能量必然点亮意识,如灯必有光,更好比镜必然显像, 而有的意识(生命)误以为自己是被心镜中的物像点亮的。(对于人类来说,更多地是会误以为自己的知觉是建立在对身体的触觉之上。)

我们不知道自己就是“不知”(好比黑暗),被知,被光明,(被建立在触觉之上的所谓身体)......遮瞎了眼。(不知为不知,知之为知之,是知也。知建立在不知之上)

人,之所以为人,不同于野兽等其他动物,或许就在于人有明确的自我意识。明上加明,头上安头。 认为此明必为某明所明。此知觉必然是被某个能知能觉所知所觉的。"所知"明显,"暗能"不知道在哪里,往往误以为是所知所觉中最“亲近”的那个,即身体。

从此,能所对立,镜像对立,我与非我对立,是谓对象化思维。(自我意识的建立是有个过程的,没有人是突然知道有个我的,婴儿抢奶喝,并不自私,只是本能而已)

自我意识不太可能有所谓的"绝对的有"或"绝对地无自我意识”,至少我个人的经验不是如此。我不记得我是在某一天突然就从没有自我意识变得知道有个我了。假设我记错了。那么我是在哪一天“无中生有”的呢?学会说“我”的那一天?觉得痛的那一天?还是开始焦虑的那一天?(当人学会了我这个概念,但在潜意识里发觉找不到自己时,就会开始不自觉地焦虑紧张乃至燥郁。) 我以前不知道为什么有人对痛感之类的触觉那么重视。 现在比较能理解了。我小时候开始焦虑时,也是在潜意识里通过抓挠反复确认自己的身体还在的。

对我来说,还有孤独感,也是伴随自我意识越来越强烈的。我(没做过调查)主观地认为,一个人个性越强,个体意识、自由意志、自我意识越明显,就越感到自己的孤立与独立。(反之亦然,有可能孤独与个性互相促进越演越烈。) 人多多少少都有点孤独。而喜欢热闹的,未尝不是因为害怕孤独。(会害怕,正说明其感受到了孤独)

这还因为我们看到的听到的乃至要表达的自己与别人看到的听到的我们是不一样的。(例如照片与镜像的不同,自己声音的录音听起来很陌生,等等)

而自己的真相究竟如何, (生命的本质到底是什么),是连我们自己都看不到找不到的。

需要说明的是:孤独感每个人多少都会有。而孤独这件事是没有的。至少也有清风明月相伴。(只是极少会有人在乎花花草草之类的......)

所谓“改”,顶多不过是在原来的真相上加了个假相而已。所谓假,是相对于真而言。戏假情真。至少怕死怕得要死,总是真的吧?除妄亦是妄,识妄即是真。认识到自己有可能不知道自己不知道,就不会过于自以为是了。)

其实也无所谓前后,只是我们只能见前不能见后而已。(更准确地说,是只习惯向前看,所谓向内返照,也是在向前看眼前的黑暗,对我来说,太无聊了。 除非你对触感特别敏感。)请注意,向前看,看到的不是未来,就是现在,来自过去,是已经注定了的。(我们看不到未来。过去的真相对我们来说,也是未知。现在来自过去,不等于过去,信息在传递的过程中不太可能一点都不变的。)(既然现在是过去传来的信息在此时此地的集合,没有理由认为一定没有下一个瞬间,死后未必断灭。)

(人人眼前一个2D的大屏幕,我们与它的距离为0 。3d的平直的空间是我们推想出来的。严格说来,是个幻觉。科学家已经推算出空间实际应该是弯曲的。)

我们的“眼后”不是明,也不是暗或黑暗或darkness,连所谓的能见之镜、(诸如此类)也没有,更不要说镜中明暗或五彩了。

这个“不知”姑且可以算是一切的背景、舞台、姑且可以推想为根本,姑且可以当作自己的归宿,(如能不惧生死,就更好了。既然瞬间即永恒,又何必非要有个来去。只是所谓“无限心”,由对死亡的恐惧而生起的“无限的想象乃至妄想”的确需要个安顿处(受王德峰教授的启发) 其实都是记忆相,时间相,相续相,这条“蛇”或“念珠串”,(如同视觉暂留)带给我们的错觉,本就时时刻刻都在生死中,方生方死,方死方生(断章于《庄子》)。我们不知道自己忘记或记错了什么。不是么?

前世后世之说,是说不通的。甚至可以说是荒唐的。有前世记忆只能说明没有真的死。那些没有前世记忆的才是真的死过了。既然清空了记忆重来,就是独立的人格了。另一个人了。(获得了重新做人,重新培养人格的机会)

有一次,某位网友问我:为什么他觉得自己有很多前世,却都是死于同一场南京大屠杀的。我打了个比方。庄子:方生方死,方死方生。好比叠在一起的麻将牌。区别只是叠得整齐不整齐。来世下面还有来世,还是要清空了重来,不值得追求。更何况死了应该就脱离时间线了。所谓前世的记忆不可能没有个开头,那就不是什么前世,而就是这一世。

(面对那个“不知”,人们各有各的想象,各有各的愿望。过于执着的想象,过于坚定的愿望已经成为不容非议的信仰。其实即便假设只是猜想,也有猜对的可能,的确没有必要一定要去非议。除非他们要(背后暗中)诅咒甚至消灭退出者。)

各种加强信念的ACTIVITY, 甚至科学实验,都是一类的。科学信念中最基本的估计是能量守恒。暗物质暗能量找不到,但一定在暗处。其实没有道理,也可以是算错了,或在宇宙这个密室之外。就是一种信念。

镜中像和电视里的一样,都好比是有个虚拟世界(有意或无意地)放映出来“呼应”我们的。(呼应恐惧也是一种呼应)

(从电视剧剧情里是推算不出电视机原理的,只能算是大胆的猜想。换了个新奇的电视剧剧情也一样。换了个梦不等于梦醒了。)

(不要太入戏,太认真。学会欣赏永恒的美,包括悲剧或闹剧之美,甚至恐怖片。不过,这话说起来容易过分轻松,生死间的确是有大恐怖的。所以做个心中无鬼,乃至心中无愧的好人还是有好处的。向自己坦白吧。自己原谅自己。自己宽恕自己。真心要改不用向别人表示。)

All we need to do is having a faith in ourselves (the unknown true oneself), no matter what it is, it is always here.

However inside of each yang there always is yin, every faith/hope is based on doubt/fear.

If you've already 100% certain about something, there is no need of a belief.

So, the real ultimate war between light and darkness is inside of us, not outside.

上文机器翻译: 我们需要做的就是对自己(未知的真实的自己)有信心,无论它是什么,它总是存在的。

然而,在每一个阳的内部总是有阴的,在每一个信仰/希望是基于怀疑/恐惧的。

如果你已经对某件事情有了100%的把握,就没有必要再去相信。

所以,光明与黑暗之间真正的终极战争是在我们内部,而不是外部。

有一点很有必要说明一下。

光明与黑暗,(甚至于其他高大上的名词,例如:空/emptiness, 无/nothingness, 觉醒/awakening),都是些比喻。

我个人认为,都是指向知背后的“不知”的。unknown 这个字眼在西方文化里隐含着对未知的恐惧。

面对不知未知无知,人们总是有无限的想象。

(庄子说:吾生也有涯,而知也无涯。其实我们不知道有涯无涯,可知还是不可知,

只是人的想象力无限,总是猜想其为“无限心”之类。)

黑暗(未来或死亡)常常带来无边的恐惧。光线(逻辑)的无限延申给我们带来希望。

看了《我们诞生在中国》,我曾有点感想:

不知,未知,未来,死亡,黑暗并不一定意味着恐惧,

同样可以意味着希望。

当一个人陷入绝境,仰望黑夜,或许会想冥冥之中会有什么呢?会不会来救我呢?

而自以为是的全知与不可能只会带来绝望。

如果有什么光明与黑暗的战争,那不会是地域民族宗教主义之争,也不会是什么是非善恶正邪佛魔之争,就是希望与恐惧乃至绝望之战, 或者说,就是信念(例如决定论)与怀疑的内战 。

There is a film that says it all: everything passes, but the truth remains.

(As to whether the truth is knowable or unknowable? Even that question may be unknowable. At least I don't know. And, annoyingly, I don't think anyone else does either, because I am biased towards "indeterminate omniscience". How can I be sure that I really know everything, that there are no more unknowns, that there are no more unknowns that I don't know I don't know?

It is logically impossible to be sure. But it is easy to be fooled by one's "supernatural powers" (or by new and strange visions and dreams).

Yet, whether it is known or not, the truth is the real truth, the real phase, and it is there, unshakable, whether one can reach it or not. (Everest is Everest, and does not cease to be Everest just because no one knows it.)

(But...)

In fact (the flying arrow isn't really flying, any moment is eternal) nothing has passed, it is just not in sight.

(The future, unknown, is just not in sight if we assume it will definitely come.)

(Each of our moments, the present of the indivisible mirror/image... is an eternal truth that cannot be changed or tampered with. So it is not "right there", but right here, right now, right before you. It's just that I think subjectively: we can't reach each other's objective truth. My subjectivity is your objectivity, and your subjectivity is my objectivity. (Inevitably, we misunderstand each other, we cannot understand each other, and we are ultimately alone.)

The so-called "change" is at most a false image added to the original truth. The so-called fake is to say by comparing with the real. The play is fake and the love is real. At least if one is afraid of dying, it is always true, right? The removal of delusion is also delusion; the knowledge of delusion is the truth. (Realising that it is possible that you do not know that you do not know, you will not be too presumptuous.)

In fact, there is no such thing as before and after, only that we can only see before but not the opposite. (More accurately, it is a habit of looking forward only, and it is too boring to look back inwards, where there is only darkness.) Be aware to that "looking forward", what you see is not the future, it is all in the past, it is already predetermined.

(A big 2D screen in front of everyone's eyes, from which we are at a distance of 0. The flat space of 3d is what we conjecture. Strictly speaking, it is an illusion. Scientists have deduced that space should actually be curved.)

There is not light, nor darkness behind our eyes, not even a so-called mirror of visibility, (or something like that), let alone light or darkness or colour in the mirror

This "not knowing" can be considered the backdrop, the stage, the root of everything, the place where one belongs, (if only one could live and die without fear). If all moment is eternal, why should there be a coming and going? It is only the so-called "infinite mind", "infinite imagination and even infinite delusion" that needs a place to settle down (inspired by Professor Wang Defeng).

In fact, it is due to the illusion of memory, of time, of continuity, of being in the midst of birth and death all the time, of being born and dying, of being born and dying (broken chapter in Zhuangzi). We do not know what we have forgotten or misremembered. Don't we?

Once, someone asked me why he felt he had many past lives, all of which died in the same Nanjing Massacre. I drew an analogy. Zhuangzi: once born immediately dies, and once dies immediately born. It is like mahjong tiles stacked together. The difference is only whether they are stacked neatly or not. There is an afterlife beneath the afterlife, and it still has to be emptied and started over, not worth pursuing. What's more, if you die, you should be out of the timeline. The memories of the so-called past lives cannot be without a beginning, so it's not a past life, it's this one.

(People have their own imaginations and wishes when it comes to that "I don't know". The overly persistent imagination and the overly determined wish have become unquestionable beliefs. In fact, even if the hypothesis is only a guess, there is a possibility that it is correct, and there is indeed no need to criticise it. (Unless they want to curse or even destroy the quitters.)

The image in the mirror, like the one on television, is like a virtual world projected (intentionally or unintentionally) to "cater" to us. (Pandering to fear is also a form of pandering)

(The principle of television cannot be deduced from the plot of a television series. It is the same with a new and novel drama. Changing a dream is not the same as waking up from a dream.)

(Don't get too caught up in the drama and take it too seriously. Learn to appreciate timeless beauty, including the beauty of tragedy or farce, even horror films. However, it is easy to say this too easily, and there are indeed great horrors between life and death. So it still pays to be a good person with no ghosts in your heart, or even no shame. Confess it to yourself. Forgive yourself.. (There is no need to show others that you really want to change.)

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

菜单
  1. 布兰妮   偶尔沉默偶尔水,偶尔精分偶尔雷

    我没太看懂,感觉是不是和佛教有什么关系?

  2. 刘少奇  
  3. 布兰妮   偶尔沉默偶尔水,偶尔精分偶尔雷
  4. Emerald  

    楼主讲了三件事,前两件是存在与感知、客观的实在,第三件是认识人生的无意义但是最终决定通过自身的行为赋予其意义。

    @布兰妮 @刘少奇 上面是我的推测,不知道准不准。

  5. 布兰妮   偶尔沉默偶尔水,偶尔精分偶尔雷
  6. Emerald  
  7. 布兰妮   偶尔沉默偶尔水,偶尔精分偶尔雷
  8. minjohnz   忙于实修。不回复。除非是的确有趣有意思的。如果你很在意我为什么不回复,建议不要写很长的评论。在质疑我的表达力前,请先质疑自己的理解力。

    @Emerald #184697 不准。我只说了执着于想象以至于不承认只是想象的无意义。没说人生无意义。人生不需要这种执着。这不重要。重要在前面,你的总结我看不懂。我的总结:怀疑论与决定论的另类结合

  9. natasha 饭姐
    natasha  

    @minjohnz #184716

    小子不才,请您解释一下,何为怀疑论,何为决定论?

  10. minjohnz   忙于实修。不回复。除非是的确有趣有意思的。如果你很在意我为什么不回复,建议不要写很长的评论。在质疑我的表达力前,请先质疑自己的理解力。

    @natasha #184718 自己贴的标签而已。其实不是,是一种另类。

  11. natasha 饭姐
    natasha  

    @minjohnz #184725

    您这一解释,我更糊涂了:)

    没关系,哲学可以是公共哲学,也可以成为私人领地,一花便是一世界:)

  12. 邹韬奋 外逃贪官CA
    邹韬奋   虽然韬光养晦,亦当奋起而争(拜登永不为奴:h.2047.one)
  13. natasha 饭姐
    natasha  

    @消极 #184728

    您这是价值决定论,我用怀疑论来质疑一下这顿饭的意义。

  14. minjohnz   忙于实修。不回复。除非是的确有趣有意思的。如果你很在意我为什么不回复,建议不要写很长的评论。在质疑我的表达力前,请先质疑自己的理解力。
  15. Emerald  
  16. minjohnz   忙于实修。不回复。除非是的确有趣有意思的。如果你很在意我为什么不回复,建议不要写很长的评论。在质疑我的表达力前,请先质疑自己的理解力。

    (第二版) 有个电影说得好:一切都会过去,唯有真理永存。

    (我偏向“不可确定全知论”。如何确定真地已经全知道了,如何确定真地没有未知了,如何确定真地没有不知道自己不知道了?

    逻辑上是不可能确定的。却很容易被自己的“极其超能力”(或被新奇的幻境梦境)给蒙骗了。

    然而,无论可不可知,真理或真相就是真的理、真的相、就在那里,无可动摇,无论人们能不能到达。泰山就是泰山,不会因为没人认识就不成为泰山。)

    我们至少可以发现四个真,“觉不离当下是真的“”瞬间即永恒、是真的”“我的真情实感是真的,例如对死亡的恐惧”“我是真的”

    (飞矢不动,瞬间即永恒)什么都没过去,只是不在眼前而已。

    (未来,未知,假设一定会来的话,也只是不在眼前而已。)

    (我们的每一个瞬间,镜像不二的当下,都是永恒的真相,无可更改或篡改。所以也不是“就在那里”,而是就在这里,就在眼前,就在当下。只是我主观地认为:彼此达到不了对方的客观真相。我的主观就是你的客观,你的主观就是我的客观。难免误会,理解不能,终究孤独。

    所谓“改”,顶多不过是在原来的真相上加了个假相而已。所谓假,是相对于真而言。戏假情真。至少怕死怕得要死,总是真的吧?除妄亦是妄,识妄即是真。认识到自己有可能不知道自己不知道,就不会过于自以为是了。)

    其实也无所谓前后,只是我们只能见前不能见后而已。(更准确地说,是只习惯向前看,所谓向内返照,也是在向前看眼前的黑暗,对我来说,太无聊了。 除非你对触感特别敏感。)请注意,向前看,看到的不是未来,就是现在,来自过去,是已经注定了的。(我们固然看不到未来。过去的真相对我们来说,也是未知。现在来自过去,不等于过去,信息在传递的过程中不太可能一点都不变的。)

    (人人眼前一个2D的大屏幕,我们与它的距离为0 。3D的平直的空间是我们推想出来的。严格说来,是个幻觉。科学家已经推算出空间实际应该是弯曲的。)

    我们的"眼后"(视觉这面镜子的对立面)不是明,也不是暗或黑暗或darkness,连所谓的能见之镜、(诸如此类)也没有,更不要说镜中明暗或五彩了。

    这个”不知“可以算是一切的背景、舞台、可以推想为根本,可以当作自己的归宿,(如能不惧生死,就更好了。既然瞬间即永恒,又何必非要有个来去。只是所谓“无限心”,由对死亡的恐惧而生起的“无限的想象乃至妄想”的确需要个安顿处(受王德峰教授的启发)

    其实都是记忆相,时间相,相续相,(如同视觉暂留)带给我们的错觉,本就时时刻刻都在生死中,方生方死,方死方生(断章于《庄子》)。我们不知道自己忘记或记错了什么。不是么?

    前世后世之说,是说不通的。有前世记忆只能说明没有真的死。那些没有前世记忆的才是真的死过了。既然清空了记忆重来,就是独立的人格了。另一个人了。(获得了重新做人,重新培养人格的机会)

    某位网友曾问我:为什么他觉得自己有很多前世,却都是死于同一场南京大屠杀的。我打了个比方。庄子:方生方死,方死方生。好比叠在一起的麻将牌。区别只是叠得整齐不整齐。来世下面还有来世,还是要清空了重来,不值得追求。更何况死了应该就脱离时间线了。所谓前世的记忆不可能没有个开头,那就不是什么前世,就是这一世。

    (面对那个“不知”,人们各有各的想象,各有各的愿望。过于执着的想象,过于坚定的愿望已经成为不容非议的信仰。其实即便假设只是猜想,也有猜对的可能,的确没有必要一定要去非议。除非他们要(背后暗中)诅咒甚至消灭退出者。)

    各种加强信念的ACTIVITY, 甚至包括科学实验。所信的定律中最基本的估计是能量守恒。暗物质暗能量找不到,但一定在暗处。其实没有道理,也可以是算错了,或在宇宙这个“密室”之外。就是一种信念。

    镜中像和电视里的一样,都好比是有个虚拟世界(有意或无意地)放映出来”呼应“我们的。(呼应恐惧也是一种呼应)

    (从电视剧剧情里是推算不出电视机原理的。换了个新奇的电视剧剧情也一样。换了个梦不等于梦醒了。)

    (不要太入戏,太认真。学会欣赏永恒的美,包括悲剧或闹剧之美,甚至恐怖片。不过,这话说起来容易过分轻松,生死间的确是有大恐怖的。所以做个心中无鬼,乃至无愧的好人还是有好处的。向自己坦白吧。自己原谅自己。自己宽恕自己。真心要改不用向别人表示。)

    There is a film that says it all: everything passes, but the truth lives on.

    (I am inclined towards "indeterminable omniscience". How can one be sure that he already knows everything, how can one be sure that there are no more unknowns , how can one be sure that he doesn't know his ignorance?

    It is logically impossible to be sure. But it is easy to be fooled by one's "extremely supernatural powers" (or by novel and strange visions and dreams).

    Yet, whether it is known or not, the truth is the real truth, and it is there, unshakable, whether one can reach it or not. (The Everest is Everest, and does not cease to be Everest just because no one knows it.)

    We can find at least four truths, "Awareness is true without leaving the present moment," "The moment is eternal and true," "My true feelings are true, such as the fear of death" "I am real."

    (A flying arrow is not actually moving, its existing in each moment is eternal) Nothing has passed, it is just not in the sight before you.

    (The future, unknown, is just not in sight either, if we assume it must come.)

    (Each of our moments, the indivisible mirror and image of the present, is an eternal truth that cannot be altered or tampered with. So it is not "right there", but right here, right now, right before you. It's just that I think subjectively: we can't reach each other's objective truths. My subjectivity is your objectivity, and your subjectivity is my objectivity. It is inevitable that there will be misunderstandings, that full understanding will not be possible, and that we will be alone in the end.

    The so-called "change" is, at best, a mere falsehood added to the original truth. The so-called fake is in contrast to the real. The play is fake and the love is real. At least the fear of dying is always real, right? The removal of delusion is also delusion; the knowledge of delusion is the truth. (Realising that it is possible that you do not know that you do not know, you will not be too presumptuous.)

    In fact, there is no such thing as before and after, only that we can only see before but not after. (It is more accurate to say that one is only used to looking forward, and the so-called looking back inward, which is also looking forward into the darkness before us, is too boring for me. Unless you are particularly sensitive to the sense of touch and the body.) Note that looking forward doesn't mean we can see the future but the present, which is from the past, and is already predetermined. (We certainly do not see the future. The truth of the past is also unknown to us. The present comes from the past and is not the same as the past; it is unlikely that information will remain the same at all as it is passed on.)

    (A large 2D screen in front of everyone's eyes, from which we are at a distance of 0. The flat space of 3D is what we conjecture. Strictly speaking, it is an illusion. Scientists have deduced that space should actually be curved.)

    Our "behind the eyes" (the opposite of the mirror of vision) is not light, nor darkness , not even the so-called mirror of visibility, (or something like that), let alone the images of light and darkness or colours.

    This "not knowing" can be considered the backdrop, the stage, the root of everything, the place where one belongs, (if only one could live and die without fear). If the moment is eternal, why should there be a coming and going? It is only the so-called "infinite mind", the "infinite imagination and even delusion" arising from the fear of death, that needs a place to settle down (inspired by Professor Wang Defeng).

    In fact, it is the illusion of memory, of time, of continuity (as in the case of visual transience), of being in the midst of birth and death all the time, of being born and dying, of being born and dying (broken chapter in Zhuangzi). We do not know what we have forgotten or misremembered. Isn't it?

    The idea of past lives and future lives does not make sense. Having memories of past lives only means that one did not really die. Those without past-life memories are the ones who have really died. Now that you have cleared your memory and started over, you are a separate person. Another person. (Gained the opportunity to be a new person, to develop a new personality)

    A certain netizen once asked me why he felt he had many past lives, yet they all died in the same Nanjing Massacre. I drew an analogy. Zhuangzi: once born and dies, and once dies and born. It is like mahjong tiles that are stacked together. The difference is only whether they are stacked neatly or not. There is an afterlife beneath the afterlife, and it still has to be emptied and started again, not worth pursuing. What's more, if you die, you should be out of the timeline. The memories of the so-called past lives cannot be without a beginning, so it's not a past life, it's this one.

    (People have their own imaginations and desires when it comes to that "I don't know". The overly persistent imagination and the overly determined wish have become unquestionable beliefs. In fact, even if the hypothesis is just a guess, there is a possibility that it is correct, and there is indeed no need to criticise it. (Unless they want to curse (behind their backs) or even destroy the quitters.)

    Various ACTIVITY, even scientific experiments, are used to strengthen beliefs. The most fundamental of the laws believed in is estimated to be the conservation of energy. Dark matter and dark energy cannot be found, but must be in the dark. It doesn't make sense, it can be miscalculated, or it can be outside the "sealed room" of the universe. It is a belief.

    The image in the mirror, like the one on television, is like a virtual world that is projected (intentionally or unintentionally) to "echo" us. (Echoing fear is also an echo)

    (The principle of television cannot be deduced from the drama. The same is true of a new and novel drama. Changing a dream is not the same as waking up from them.)

    (Don't get too caught up in the drama and take it too seriously. Learn to appreciate timeless beauty, including the beauty of tragedy or farce, even horror films. However, it is easy to say this too casually, and there are indeed great horrors between life and death. So it still pays to be a good person with no ghosts in your heart, or even no shame. Confess it to yourself. Forgive yourself. (There is no need to show others that you really want to change.)

  17. 刘少奇  

    你是批发括弧的吗

  18. minjohnz   忙于实修。不回复。除非是的确有趣有意思的。如果你很在意我为什么不回复,建议不要写很长的评论。在质疑我的表达力前,请先质疑自己的理解力。