一说民主,就是仗着人多去游行,去喊口号,去投票。 太狭隘。
可以鼓吹轮流执政。八年换一轮。不用投票。
又或者鼓吹总书记去世界旅行,内政交给全国CEO行业内部选拔的总理,做得不好就换一个。
等等等等
一说民主,就是仗着人多去游行,去喊口号,去投票。 太狭隘。
可以鼓吹轮流执政。八年换一轮。不用投票。
又或者鼓吹总书记去世界旅行,内政交给全国CEO行业内部选拔的总理,做得不好就换一个。
等等等等
英美,尤其是美国或拉美,与中国文化,差别没有日本那么大,也是很随便的。
留学,常常还是在象牙塔里,不容易真的全面。例如王小波,不知道asshole不是傻而是混,可见他在美国日常交流的都不是普通人。
当时留学日本的普遍比留学欧美的激进。人都是差不多的。日本人出生在日本文化中,被要求克制几乎成了习惯, 一旦到了中国,还是有解放自己原形毕露的。还有欧洲人,到了中国常常发现太好了,随便穿马路扔垃圾大声说活,都不想走了。
如果是这样的话。说明所谓主体主义先军政治是比较说得通的(我的确不太了解这个所谓主体到底指什么),可以支撑朝鲜人的自尊自信。
这位刘娘娘才是支黑的源头?
当总统不需要能力,甩手给总理就好了。只有傻习学雍正。
还有习。川普也说过他与习是一类。的确,他们气味相投。都觉得天命在己,the chosen one.
以我看,人都是差不多的。中国人身上我最讨厌的,诸如势利眼,狗眼看人低,气人有笑人无,趋炎附势,嫉贤妒能,等等,别国人身上也有,只是比较懂得掩饰而已。 白人那种屈尊式的礼貌,正能量的互夸,等等,也是挺可笑的。
不如检讨文化。例如明显缺乏自尊自信。 (建立在制度或文化上的,我背靠了大树所以我很自信,也是在提供笑料。) 所谓自信,哪有建立在信组织或信社会之上的,这是一种反讽吗?手握笔杆子,枪杆子心里不慌?牺牲做了笔杆子刀把子很自豪?
没有自尊,何来自信? 关于如何建立自尊,早已谈过,不再重复。 简单总结,关键在所谓“自己”究竟是什么。肯定不是党组织或英明领袖。不是钱或权。也不是外在的上帝或不需要人的逻辑真理。
检讨人种不如检讨文化。检讨文化不如检讨制度。 现代制度各个国家其实也差不多。毛病也一样,主要就是没有认真反垄断。甚至政府自己搞垄断。 垄断可能难免。但应该要求提供免费服务。包括国营事业。估计垄断的热情就大幅下降了。
(人都是差不多的。日本人出生在日本文化中,被要求克制几乎成了习惯, 一旦到了中国,还是有解放自己原形毕露的。还有欧洲人,到了中国常常发现太好了,随便穿马路扔垃圾大声说活,都不想走了。)
歪点楼。为什么土共的美学远比不上纳粹的?所谓的集体主义美学为什么在伪新中国或朝鲜未必成立?我认为,是因为用力过猛。急吼吼。缺乏内在修养。尤其缺乏真正的自尊自信。由于被自卑驱动的惶恐,更关注实用。并不在乎美丑,也顾不上感受美丑。
不宜首先强调民主或民主化。 这个词里面有股多数人暴政的味道,让我这种常两边受气的边缘人觉得又是换汤不换药。
先建立自尊乃至互相尊重,至少尊重彼此的人权,例如言论自由,比较重要。
自尊最好是建立在自立自学自治自主之上,而不是投胎技术好,先天就是个强势。 (所谓自立,主要是思想上要有自己的一套信念,不是什么财务自由)
反抗有很多方式,未必要聚众。 例如我曾经孤身去派出所自首自己到处散布不满,借机在派出所公开嘲笑讽刺红屁股们。 下次我或许会去举报:“党内有大间谍。谁在推扮演美国军工复合体假想敌,谁就有间谍嫌疑。为什么不放开国境,让所有人都可以出去打工,这才是敌人们最害怕的。”
Demonstration也有很多方式,例如可以人人佩戴维尼熊的饰品。 大家可以自己开动脑筋。 总之,不要太predictable, 白纸 就算比较有创意了,但还是不够出奇。
非暴力不合作。从不配合说谎开始。 首先自己先想清楚了。 细节不用太在意。 最关键的观念,那些人人在喊的口号,实际是什么? 书本,甚至词典,可信吗? 还有那些顺口就能说出来的,被重复太多遍的。 例如:相信科学?敌人的敌人是朋友?枪杆子里出政权?谎言重复多了就成了真理? 等等等等
识破把国家人格化之类的话术是比较基本的独立思考能力。 如果你不知道我在说什么,建议你做事做决定慢一拍,你未必真知道自己在干什么。
我翻墙的能力有限,打不开品葱。只听说过,从来没见过。
这里据说是反贼论坛。 我似乎也认同自己是个反贼。 但作为对不假外求的中国古文化还相当喜欢的气功实验者, 我不会反华,
也不会反中,因为在我看来非天下观的新中国不是毛泽东的,也不是蒋介石或孙中山的, 来自胡适等倡导的新白话(相对红楼梦中的旧白话而言) 我并不反对我手写我口。只是我打字的水平有限。
我甚至不会反共,因为我爸也是。
我要反的就是台上的老几们。习以及毛,首当其冲。
pinkFLOYD:墙上的另一块砖,就是在讽刺台上的老几们自己也是标准化教育的产物。 洗你脑的也没多少老几。把他们的浆糊复制给你,并没有使他们自己更清楚。 越早看清黑箱里并没多少老几的越早离开。最早就是他们自己。例如习远平。
以前我以为是为了上位装傻装低调。现在看来,低调肯定是装的,傻是真的傻。
智商什么的并不重要。骨子里的自卑才是最糟糕的。毛以及习,土共普遍自卑,又屁股不干净,才是只能黑箱不敢公开的原因, 他们未必有我说的配合美国军工复合体扮演西方公敌的大战略。这只是讽刺,当真就太高估他们了。
老百姓反对自己的政府,要求下台换人(换政策!)是天经地义的。可以光明正大,不要贼头贼脑。我有一次因为友人去世,到派出所自首寻衅,借机发了通脾气。 下次再去,争取心平气和好好说。 (重复一遍。先建立自信,然后心平气和,光明正大,去有关部门,甚至直接去暴力机器自首。我就是这么打算的。以前做得太仓促,下次再去。先做好最坏打算,安顿好家人。)
我大概懂了。你好像早说过了。算了。各忙各的吧。我打字慢,没能耐玩
不想告诉我?那就算了。你们的词汇对我来说太陌生了。难交流。 如有误会以至冒犯,请海涵。
没那么多时间。禅宗是比较有趣。但我不是。我现在是偏实修派的。
鱼?流量?用户黏度? 不懂在说什么? 应该不是钱吧。 炒热了这里,有什么用?又多了个发泄场所?还不够多?
我看到,小孩们在耍大刀。
不独中国人,我看川普也是个巨婴。(与该供在庙里的人格国家神无关,我指的就是一个个人)
工具没有用工具的人重要,这本该是很清楚的常识。
不知道为什么,(又或者只是因为急功近利),理科生以及所谓理科思维,似乎牛得很。
严格来讲,身体不过就是坐骑(步行骑的水牛)。或者空手把的锄头,也是工具。
心理学比医学更重要。
人与动物不同,不止有个身体,也不总是由本能或情绪驱动。
也许,社会学,才是最值得研究的。
又或者,关注自我意识,以及由其带来的自我迷失,孤独,寻找寄托,刺激,以至于交流障碍互相毁灭, 才是最根本的。
语言,有天然的弱点。所谓随遮随诠,随诠随遮,没完没了。
我似乎已经说得太多,常常碰到怪我多嘴的。
(旧文重贴)关于自尊自信。 不知道孔子是什么时候确立自己“一以贯之”的道的? 三十而立?四十不惑? 我都快五十,才似乎真正站稳脚跟,应该不会再在“自己”或“自性”(空性起缘)与“天命”或“集体”(缘起性空)间摇摆了。 我打算首先清算我自己以前的思想,“思而不学”,基本完了(如果我还有时间)再来清算别人的,“学而不思”。
(以下是最近我与网友聊天中我单方面的发言记录,稍作修改) 那是我以前写的。可能过分强调不可知了。不如强调“不知”。我不知道到底可知还是不可知。至少被瞎猜蒙对的可能还是有的,
或许没有绝对的对错,绝对的真理或真相,相对地真、比较地对还是有的。 例如你的主观对我来说就是客观。 但是我有我的主观,很难绝对得知道你在说什么。
其实由于语言的局限,我连我自己到底是怎么想的,什么是我自己的绝对真相,严格来说也是不知道的。
所以与其说是不可知论,不如说是神秘主义。 与宗教无渋,孔子也说不知。
但是有一点是肯定的,那就是我自己的存在。 即便是梦,也是我自己梦。 即便一切皆幻,我自己不是幻。
这个自己是个平台,思想,身体,特殊的......都是一台戏里暂时的角色。 戏假情真。
我有个信念,身体或思想有生灭,平台没有。 这是信念,因为没有证据。
各种证据不过是换了出新戏。 被新戏新梦蒙骗,就是所谓的入魔。
因为所有的证据都不可靠,所以一点都不怀疑也是不可能的。
一切或许就是这阴阳一体的造化。 信念与怀疑。 希望与恐惧。
与其唯物质,不如唯能量, 与其唯能量,不如唯自己。
以上是我最近总结出来的。
内在常在,外在影响不了,好比风吹不动光。
死后到底如何是不一定的,未必能解开终极之迷。 我估计这是永恒之迷。
我觉得这世界还不错,天天看猴戏,......
问:出家是不是很需要钱?在学校能好好学吗?(就是固定的时间去读经书有用吗)? 答:慧能早就说过:三藏十二部经,我们的自性中本就有,本就是从我们的自性中来的。不要舍本逐末,骑驴找驴。 (不是传说中的100%大彻大悟的所谓明心见性。) (能指使人把“常清净”改成“无一物”的不会是所谓的一般人。)
What is meant by "pure dharma"? Why is it significant that the Maitreya will teach it? In China, there have been some prophecies about that there will be a future saint to bring us the ultimate truth or facts (including all the laws or orders if there is any), e.g. , . Since it is the ultimate one, you can imagine it must be so pure that there wouldn't be any mistake. And as we all know, China is still at least bit of a communist state. As I remember there was a famous person (I don't remember who he is ) which said that when you are young if you don't believe in communism, you are a bad guy who don't have a good heart, after you've become older, if you're still believing in communism, you are a fool who don't have a sound brain. A communist usually believe that the human being is able to grab the truth. There is a rumor or legend in china about Karl Marx that he had grind-ed out a pair of footprints on the floor of a library which he visited everyday. At that time there was no sign of Information explosion,you could still dream of summing up a (pure) truth from all the books and with that to solve all the problems in the world. Now things are different. Maybe people are still dreaming of a future saint but he has to find an another way. Someone ruining a small part of a floor of a library haven't brought us a perfect paradise (pure land). Could we be granted one because somebody of us is sitting under a tree for a long time? Hope is always better than fear, let's assume it is possible. Then why the present saints and so many ones in the history are not enough, why we still need a future one such as Maitreya? Why the pure teachings have become impure? Should we always blame an outer demon? Is there an inner reason? By the way, I'm not a typical Buddhist, in my view, zen may be from Buddhism (actually The Zhuangzi probably is a more important source of zen), but far beyond Buddhism. According to Dajian Huineng, who from my view is the founder of zen, all the teachings (including so called pure dharma) can not be the source, since they have their own source: a sudden awakening. (It is not that the pure dharma is the source of awakenings, but the opposite, the awakening is the source of all dharma no matter how pure it is.) If you think we must follow a saint, who is the one that the first saint followed? People always overvalue their outer owned things such as a holy book written by a saint, or their own outer behaviors such as eating some particular food, or their special experiences (no matter spiritual ones or not, no matter how unique, in my view, they are still the outer instead of the real inner) . But can we control a TV set by analyzing the images (dramas) on the screen? If not, does that mean all the successes of our logic and the science based on that are a practical joke of "the TV" (it could be Tao or god or Buddha or some other things e.g. merely coincidence such as a randomly typing monkey)? Thus, a good zen master has nothing to teach you, since all you need to do is just unbinding yourself from all those clinging. Not only unbinding from the clinging to the images or phenomena, but also unbinding from the clinging to all kinds of imaginations and concepts which are related to "the mirror/TV set/the author", including all the teachings no matter how pure they are. They are the blindfolds which are hiding the ultimate truth including the true nature of ourselves. The salvation is never from outer things such as a future saint and his holy book which would be supposed to give us 100% correct (pure) knowledge. The real salvation is within yourself, since the pure ultimate truth or facts and the true nature of you( the real you) are the same thing. You have never divided from it, you can never be an independent one, you (your body and thoughts and experiences etc ) are always depending on it, because you and it are the same thing. What it really is, who you really are, how should we call them, (usually I call them "the unknown") would be some everlasting questions and eternal hidden secret. A sudden awakening wouldn't bring you more knowledge but mere a realization that all the outer are a kind of dream, the only real thing is yourself, thus you suddenly wake from the dream. If all you get is a kind of different dream, and you mistake the new dream as the reality and call yourself a saint who has more knowledge, more pure facts or truths than others, you've tricked by the demon. But I'm not talking about an outer demon. The clinging (or the energy in that grip) and the things cling-ed (or grabbed) by you are not the same thing. You should release the grip instead of escaping from the things grabbed by you or cutting off your hands. (Don't mistake the escaping as a final detachment or an ultimate liberation.) Who is there grabbing? not your hand, neither an outer demon. Thus, the energy or the force is always with you, you don't need a "may", since the true nature of you is the force, you are the force. This is the faith you can get from the sudden awakening. It is a faith because there is no proof. If you're still searching for a proof, still need a dream to be made true, still want to be a winner to prove you're the chosen. It means you don't have the true faith, and it means you've not awakened, you're still looking forward to a donkey without knowing that you are riding it. (The reason of that you need to win a haven or paradise is that you're still fearing the death. It means you've not realized that there is a birth and death to your hands and body or to your thoughts and memory, or there is a birth and death to the state of no thoughts and even no memory, but there is never a birth and death to "the force ".) Although you may understand all the logic in above words typed by me, if you don't have a faith in yourself, you are still asking me for a proof or a supporting from some saint or their "pure" words, it means that you've not actually had that sudden realization or awakening. You may need another chance. You can look for that chance in all the "pure" teachings of so many saints. Good luck!
上文谷歌翻译(略作修改):“纯净佛法”是什么意思?对弥勒教法为何重要?
在中国,有预言说将来会有圣人带给我们最终的真理或事实(包括所有法律或命令,如果有的话),例如,。
由于它是终极产品,您可以想象它必须是如此纯净,以至于不会有任何错误。
众所周知,中国至少仍然是一个国家。我记得有一个名人(我不记得他是谁)说,当你年轻时,如果你不相信,那你就是一个坏人,在你之后已经变老了,如果您仍然相信,那么您就是一个愚蠢的人,没有健全的大脑。
一个通常认为人类能够掌握真理。在中国,有一个关于的传说,他在他每天都去过的图书馆的地板上磨出了一对脚印。
那时没有信息爆炸的迹象,您仍然可以梦想从所有书籍中总结出一个(纯)真相,并以此来解决世界上所有的问题。 现在情况有所不同。也许人们仍然梦想着未来的圣人,但他必须寻找另一种方式。有人破坏了图书馆一小部分的地板并没有给我们带来一个完美的天堂(纯净的土地)。因为有人坐在树下很久,我们能被授予一个吗?
希望总比恐惧好,让我们假设这是可能的。 那么,为什么现在的圣徒以及历史上如此众多的圣徒还不够,为什么我们仍然需要像弥勒这样的未来圣徒?为什么纯粹的教义变得不纯净? 我们应该总是责怪外在的恶魔吗?有内在原因吗? 顺便说一句,我不是典型的佛教徒,我认为禅宗可能来自佛教(实际上,庄子可能是禅宗的更重要来源),但远远超出了佛教。 据被我认为是禅宗的创始人的大鉴慧能, 所有的教义(包括所谓的纯净佛法)都不能成为本源,因为它们有自己的本源:突然觉醒。 (并不是纯粹的佛法是觉醒的源头,相反,无论多么纯净,觉醒都是所有佛法的源头。)
如果您认为我们必须跟随圣人,那么第一位圣人跟随的人是谁? 人们总是高估自己的外在财产,例如圣人写的圣书,或者高估自己的外在行为,例如吃某些特殊的食物,或者他们的特殊经历(我认为,无论是否属灵,无论多么独特,它们仍然是外部,而不是真正的内部)。 但是我们可以通过分析屏幕上的图像(戏剧)来控制电视机吗?如果不是,那是否意味着我们的逻辑和科学基础上的所有成功都是“电视”的恶作剧(所谓“电视”可能是道,神,佛陀或其他一些事物,例如偶然性,例如随机打字的猴子) ?
因此,一个好的禅宗大师没有什么可教您的,因为您需要做的只是使自己摆脱所有固执的束缚。不仅摆脱对图像或现象的依附,而且摆脱对与“镜子/电视机/作者”有关的各种想象和概念的束缚,包括所有教义,无论它们多么纯正。
他们是遮住最终真理(包括我们自己的真实本性)的眼罩。救恩永远不会来自外在的事物,例如未来的圣人和他的圣书,它们本该为我们提供100%正确(纯)的知识。真正的救赎就在您自己内部,因为纯粹的最终真理或事实与您(真实的您)的真实本性是同一回事。您从未与它分开,您永远不可能成为一个独立的人,您(您的身体,思想和经验等)始终取决于它,因为您和它是同一件事。
实际上,您是谁,我们应该如何称呼它们(通常我称它们为“未知”)将是一些永恒的问题和永恒的秘密。突然的觉醒不会带给您更多的知识,而只是意识到所有外部事物都是一种梦,唯一的真实事物是您自己,因此您突然从梦中醒来。如果您得到的只是一个不同的梦,并且您将新梦误解为现实,并称自己是比其他人拥有更多知识,更多纯真事实或真理的圣徒,那么您就被恶魔欺骗了。但是我不是在谈论外来的恶魔。紧贴(或握力的能量)与您紧紧抓住(或抓住)的东西不是一回事。您应该释放握力,而不是逃脱被您抓住的东西或割断手。 (不要把逃跑当作最后的出离或最终的解放。)谁在抓住?不是你的手,不是外来的恶魔。 因此,能量或力量永远伴随着您,您不需要“愿”,因为您的本性是力量,您就是力量。
这是您从突然的醒中可以得到的信念。这是一种信念,因为没有证据。如果您仍在寻找证明,仍然需要梦想成真,仍然想要成为赢家以证明您被选中。这意味着您没有真正的信仰,也就意味着您没有醒来,您仍然期待着一头驴,却不知道自己在骑驴。 (之所以需要赢得天堂或天堂,是因为您仍在担心死亡。这意味着您尚未意识到手和身体,思想和记忆存在生与死,或者没有思想,甚至没有记忆的状态都会有生与死,但是“力量”永远不会有生与死。)尽管您可能对我键入的上述词语的所有逻辑都了解,如果您对自己不抱有信心,您仍在要求我提供一些圣人或他们的“纯”字眼的证明或支持,这意味着您实际上并未突然意识到或觉醒。您可能需要另一个机会。您可以在许多圣人的所有“纯”教训中寻找机会。祝好运! What are some mental “traps” you uncovered in your life which allowed you to move on in life? On 12th May In 2008, I was reading a book in my office, which mentions a quotation from Laozi. "It is because that I have a body so that I have so many worries. If there was no body, what could worry me?" I suddenly realized that " Why we think there must be a body? It could be just some images on a mirror (or on a TV screen, stage, platform) including the office and the whole world." So the body is the trap. 上文谷歌翻译(略作修改)您在生活中发现了哪些精神上的“陷阱”,这些陷阱可以使您继续前进? 2008年5月12日,我在办公室看书,其中提到老子的名言。 “因为我有身体,所以我担心太多。如果没有身体,我会担心什么?” 我突然意识到,“为什么我们认为必须有一个身体?它可能只是镜子(或电视屏幕,舞台,平台)上的一些图像,包括办公室和整个世界。” 所以身体就是陷阱。 问:大多数人都是平凡的,为什么却讨论只有极少数优秀的人才需要的上升通道呢? 答:未必平凡。毛遂自荐时王说你如果是锥子一定会从袋子里露头,没露就说明你不是人才。毛遂回答:你不把我放进袋子里,我露个毛头啊?(大意如此,原文忘了)。人们未必平凡,被以为乃至自以为平凡而已。
What does the dark side of the yin yang mean? Maybe we all know that yin and yang are two sides of one thing. But it is not like a coin. There is yin in the yang side, and there is yang in the yin side. (Please refer to the picture of yin yang fish.) And there is no pure yin (pure dark) nor pure yang (pure bright), since ultimate yin lead to yang and ultimate yang lead to yin. If there is a point of pure yang or pure yin, it will not last any time and change to the opposite immediately. So, there always is hope in the darkest doubt, and there always is fear in the brightest faith. No matter how passionately you hold your faith, there is always a need of proof or support which is actually based on doubt and fear and you may never have realized it. 上文谷歌翻译(略作修改) 阴阳的阴暗面是什么意思? 也许我们都知道阴和阳是一件事的两个方面。 但这不像一枚硬币。 阳侧有阴,阴侧有阳。 (请参阅阴阳鱼的图片。)而且,由于终极阴会导致阳,终极阳会导致阴,因此没有纯阴(纯黑)或纯阳(纯明亮)。 如果存在纯阳点或纯阴点,它将不会持续任何时间,而是立即变为相反的状态。 因此,在最黑暗的怀疑中总有希望,在最明的信念中总有恐惧。 无论您多么热衷于信仰,始终都需要基于怀疑和恐惧的证明或支持,您可能从未意识到。
图片
What is the essence of Buddhism in one sentence? Actually I don't know a lot about all so many different schools of Buddhism. So to me it seems possible to sum up one sentence for them. (Otherwise, I maybe too overwhelmed by too many knowledge to do that) Somebody told me the aim of Marxism is not to explain or analyse the world but to change the world. In my view, the aim of Buddhism is to avoid or release from sufferings, instead of chasing truth or goodness. But it is very important to get an correct idea of the reason of sufferings. Otherwise your way to achieve your aim would be wrong. For example, you may be blinded by an emptiness or nothingness, and try to get a so called no-self by escaping from the world, or worse try all kinds of suicide (including spiritual suicide) to escape from your own life. In my own opinion, it could be right to blame the state of clinging for anxieties or sufferings. But I don't agree to take the things we cling to as the reason of clinging . Why do we have a anxiety or desire to cling to something or attach to something. It is because we've lost ourselves. It sounds ridiculous if you go to a police station and claim this loss. But if we're blinded (blindfolded ) by all of those things before us, we can not find the true nature of ourselves, we would be nervous deeply. Even we may have never realized it clearly in mind, we're still so nervous or anxious that have to do all kinds of crazy things, using all kinds of excitements to cover our deep loss of inner peace. Thus the sentence (not only summed up from Buddhism but also from other religion or any schools of thoughts who have interest in the true nature of ourselves) would be this: " Since a true faith don't need any proof, we should have the true faith in our true nature, and doubt any so called proof or support, not matter how special or so called holy they are, don't bound or blinded by them." It means all of those things before you including your body ,your thoughts, state of no thoughts, any special even unique experiences (no matter how spiritual), any words or sentences( no matter how holy), anything, is not the true you (the real you), but you are you, you are certainly existing, no matter in what kind of forms. Your body have a birth and death, there are no birth or death to the real you (the true you). Nor winning or losing. etc. 上文谷歌翻译: 一句话佛教的实质是什么? 实际上,我对佛教的许多不同流派并不了解很多。因此对我来说,为他们总结一句话似乎是可能的。 (否则,我可能对太多的知识不知所措) 有人告诉我,马克思主义的目的不是解释或分析世界,而是改变世界。我认为佛教的目的是避免或摆脱苦难,而不是追求真理或善良。 但是,正确认识苦难的原因非常重要。否则,实现目标的方法是错误的。 例如,您可能被空虚或虚无所蒙蔽,并试图通过逃避世界来获得所谓的“无我”,或者更糟的是尝试各种自杀(包括精神上的自杀)以逃避自己的生活。 我个人认为,怪罪焦虑或痛苦的状态是正确的。但是我不同意把我们坚持的事情当作坚持的原因。为什么我们有焦虑或渴望执着于某物或依附于某物。这是因为我们迷失了自己。如果您去派出所索要这笔损失,这听起来很荒谬。但是,如果我们被摆在我们面前的所有事物所蒙蔽(蒙住双眼),我们将找不到自己的真实本性,那么我们就会感到非常紧张。甚至我们可能从未清楚地意识到这一点,我们仍然如此紧张或焦虑,不得不做各种疯狂的事情,利用各种兴奋来掩盖我们内心深处的内在损失。 因此,这句话(不仅是佛教的总结,还包括其他宗教或对自己的真实本性感兴趣的任何思想流派的总结)是:“既然真实的信仰不需要任何证据,我们应该拥有对我们真实本性的真正信仰,并且对任何所谓的证明或支持表示怀疑,无论它们有多特别或所谓的圣洁,都不要被它们束缚或蒙蔽。”它意味着所有摆在您面前的事物,包括您的身体,您的思想,无思想的状态,任何特殊甚至独特的经历(无论多么精神),任何单词或句子(无论多么圣洁),任何东西,都不是真实的您(真实的您),但是无论您采用哪种形式,您都一定存在。您的身体有生与死,真实的您(真实的您)没有生与死。也不赢也不输。等等
whatever。 不重要。我早没兴趣了。除非禅宗,或许还可以再说一点。
Anything that can be obtained can be lost.
If enlightenment means you can obtain something like light, you can also lose it.
Light is important, because it symbolize something can make you see.
But we can also see darkness.
With or without outer lights, we can see.
Because we are lives who all have inner lights.
The inner light is always there,
not something we gain from some special experiences which we call them enlightment,
so it can never be lost.
In my opinion, which may be different from any school, Śūnyatā / emptiness is a beautiful misunderstanding, or a dazzling over-interpretation.
You are probably wondering why a thing so simple as emptiness or nothingness can be too much.
As I know, when people are adventuring in meditation or drugs, they can get all kinds of special even unique experiences which could make them believing they are reaching the core nature of truth or reality.
From my view, what they are near is the unknown (the ultimate secret hidden or concealed by what we see or sense or experience, including by the sensed emptiness or nothingness like space), the ignorance.
Zhuang Zhou once said that what we know is limited, no matter how much you know, what we don't know is always unlimited.
Actually we are so ignorant, even a guy so smart like Zhuang Zhou seemed that he didn't realize that he doesn't know what we don't know is limited or unlimited.
What is really unlimited is our imagination.
When we're facing The Unknown due to some drug or meditation or other stuff, it is like we're facing darkness.
It is easy for us to imagine there is an unlimited emptiness or nothingness like space our there or in that darkness.
And because of the drugs we took or we produced ourselves naturally in our bodies, we could magnify this imagination to some extension. So much so that we lose the distinction between imagination and reality.
There is no shame in it. Because nearly all of us are doing the same things, with or without the drugs. For example, none of us has ever actually seen the space or universe, what we are seeing is always a flat two dimension picture, moving or not moving, we're using our imagination to create a three dimension "reality" in our mind, in this "reality", all lights (optical lines) are straight. Seldom of us realize what is really straight or simple is our logic (Logic is imagining with reason. Reasons are straight, simple rules some people loves to follow like fools, they are so foolish that they call these mind bindings or blinders as intelligence.)
In my view, Nirvana is so tempting because people are eager to grab a liberation from anxieties and other sufferings.
And in our imagination, with or without logical reasons, emptiness means we can finally escape from our selves.
But is it really a non-self? If there is no self, no you, who is there? Who is there admiring this emptiness?
What you lost is not you, but body, thoughts, or other id.
They are not the real you, the true you. Neither are the special spiritual experiences including state of no thoughts, state of no senses, emptiness, nothingness, others whatever they are.
None of the things before you are the real you. The true you is always there, but you can never make it show itself before you. It is like you can never lift yourself by pulling yourself 's hair.
Thus if Nirvana means you can see the true core nature or the real source of every things, it is a legend, or fairy tale.
If Nirvana means you can get the great escape from yourself, it is an impossible mission.
It maybe seems too cruel. Not all of people are grown up, a lot of people need a shelter, (Even a grownup cannot appreciate all the dark moving pictures.) so all kinds drugs (both physical and spiritual) are still popular.
First, I am not a so called believer of any so called religion, and I don't believe any school of thoughts who thinks they know so much that others should follow their teachings. Therefore, if you're not comfortable with reading something different from what they've taught you, don't read.
Second I've answered a similar question before (refer to Min John Zhou's answer to Can you offer an explanation of the Buddhist concept of emptiness/sunya and why it's important for Nirvana? Any way and school is fine. ), "emptiness" is an overvalued notion. Especially if someone told you emptiness means nothing exist, there is no meaning in life, and nothing worth of putting any emotion. No matter how famous this teacher or so called master is, he is actually a blinder who are directing other blinders.
They've been blinded by an emptiness or nothingness no matter how spiritual or special their experiences are.
Not all of Buddhists are like this. According to Platform Sutra,emptiness is just a metaphor (not a notion). In ancient Chinese, emptiness and space is the same word: 空. Thus, some zen master such as Dajian Huineng, use the empty space as a metaphor not to talk about "nothing exists" but to talk about the thing which does really exist and truly there. The images on a screen is just a dream or show which could be an illusion, but "the TV" "the stage" "the platform" is the thing really exist and truly there. Although we can never see or hear or sense or know what is this TV or stage or platform. So, what is really empty is your knowledge. The platform is like the empty space, so vast and unlimited just like all so many things you don't know. What we don't know is so much and vast, and your imagination about the unknown could be unlimited. We should admit our ignorance, admit that there always is a dream or show (including any spiritual experience such as so called emptiness) which is trying to blind us from our true nature. They are tempting us. Once you project yourself into a character in that show, such as the body, a thought(or a name, a concept, no matter how holy it is) , a state of no thoughts, or any other special state or experience such as so called emptiness or nothingness or oneness, etc,
you've lost yourself. You may talk about a nonsense such as no self.
Nobody can raise his own body by pulling his own hair. No one can reach a so called "no self" by himself. If there is no him or you and me at all, who is there blah-blah-ing "no me", and who are there listening?
From my view, without Chinese zen, Buddhism could be a joke.
A so called, so self declared "Buddha" may not have really awakened at all. If you've really waked from all kinds of dreams, and if you're not mistaking a new special even unique dream (such as so called emptiness ) as the ultimate truth, you should have faith in yourself. The real you is same as the empty space, always there and contain everything (and contain every and any dreams). It could be a bad dream, but doesn't matter. Anyone who are trying to escape from suffering is like my son who is still a little boy that can't stand horror movie.
Prior to Shakyamuni Buddha there were many other Buddhas. What was Buddhism called during those times prior to Shakyamuni Buddha? Inspired by Lotus Sutra and Diamond Sutra,I have an opinion (By the way, I am not a so called Buddhist. And I am not a believer of other religions or any schools of thoughts which claim they know the ultimate truth. If you're not comfortable with reading something different from what they've taught you, don't read.) that since any human being and any life being who has interior or inner light will be enlighten or awaken eventually, you could call them a Buddha or at least call them a Buddha-to-be. (By the way, what make us see is not only lights but also darkness. When you see the darkness, don't forget that the inner light what make you see this darkness could be the darkness itself. Lights could be the dreams which are blinding us. ) Although they've not yet awakened completely or totally enlighten, the inner or interior light and the awakening are the true nature of ourselves, we certainly are aware of it in a certain way or a certain extent. Even if we've never thought about in this life yet, we still know it subconsciously. And actually I don't think there is a state could be called completely perfect. No matter how you are aware of your true nature, you're still having to deal with so many words, concepts, notions, which are usually based on images or phenomena that are indeed the blindfolds or dreams. Since not all of the people who used those words communicating with you are completely awake, it is hard for you to be totally enlighten. In my opinion a completely enlighten or totally awake Buddha is a legend or fairy tale. Don't be fooled by a title, a name, a concept, a notion, a word. A person who called himself an awakened or enlighten Buddha might be not awake at all, especially when they're still in a dream of nothingness or blinded by an emptiness. Including awakening and enlightenment, all of them can easily be used to blind or bind you. Because we can never see "the mirror""the TV set", the stage, the platform, all that we can see are shows, images, phenomena. It is impossible for us to point out the ultimate truth or true nature. We have to use metaphor. In my other answer, I have mentioned emptiness or nothingness is mere a metaphor. And regard to the word awakening or enlightenment, they are also mere metaphors. Please refer to my other answers, if you really understand me, you will find anyone who treat these words as slogans instead of metaphors is a blinder who is trying to direct other blinders, no matter how many people treat them as a Buddha or a master. Min John Zhou's answer to What is Buddha’s realization? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-Buddhist-notion-of-emptiness/answer/Min-John-Zhou https://www.quora.com/Can-enlightenment-be-lost/answer/Min-John-Zhou
教徒,不独佛教徒,没有一个能说服我入教的。 你们不知道我经历过什么。我绝不会加入类传销组织,我自己也不会去画大饼创任何玩意。
不用猜了。我哪派都不是。借题发挥而已。
据传,佛一出世,就开口说:天上天下唯我独尊。
如果真有这种妖孽,大概会被某个禅师拖出去乱棍打死,图个天下清净。
古印度的神话往往是有寓意与哲理的。
唯我独尊,强调的是 自尊。是思想独立乃至自由的第一步。
旧文重贴。 有个寓言,声称来自佛经,实则可能是伊斯兰的故事。
说有一人,误入一洞,困在藤上,下有毒蛇,上有猛兽,还有一鼠,在啃树藤。这时他发现了眼前的蜂
蜜,于是品尝了起来。
(为什么他这么放心,心这么大,因为有真主或上帝罩着他。)
信奉人生苦短及时行乐的人不少。
但是总有人“不只眼前,还有远方”
当一个人要去“远方”(精神上的事,与环游世界,行万里路无关)时,
他的第一步是什么呢?
据传,佛一出世,就开口说:天上天下唯我独尊。
如果真有这种妖孽,大概会被某个禅师拖出去乱棍打死,图个天下清净。
古印度的神话往往是有寓意与哲理的。
唯我独尊,强调的是独立与自尊。
子曰:“吾十有五而志于学,三十而立,四十而不惑,五十而知天命,六十而耳顺,七十而从心所欲,不逾矩
。”
孔子没有现代的经济头脑,所谓三十而立,不是经济独立,财务自由。
而是指“志于学”的学,即思想独立,思想自由。
一个人要思想独立,建立信念,是有基础的。
这基础就是自尊。
研究楞严经坛经等经典是假,研究我自己的思想是真。
因为我认为我没本事也不可能知道古人客观上在讲什么,
我甚至都搞不清自己客观上是怎么想的。
《大学》所谓诚其意者,毋自欺也。如恶恶臭,如好好色,此之谓自谦。故君子必慎其独也。
所谓慎独,不能像李敖那样,简单地表面地理解为不欺暗室,不要自慰。
关键在于人总要独自面对自己的,例如独自面对死亡时,
到时,一切欺骗他人,引以为傲的东西都用不上,
(诸如金钱权力,也包括神通能力,甚至知识经历,神奇神异,境界幻梦,奇遇天授……所有的光环,
包括所谓的道德智慧,可以拿出来秀的道德智慧……)
因为无法欺骗自己。
我们很清楚自己脱去皇帝的新装后是个什么。
如果我们是个冷酷残忍,或无耻的人,那么很容易接受自己。
常有人问:为什么好人不长命,祸害遗千年?
因为好人不珍惜自己,甚至恨自己,有自虐的倾向。
他们恨自己为什么会被污染,为什么会有本能与欲望。
他们有羞耻心。
人,动物,生物,(有情)生命的本质有阴阳两面,
我执,无明,理智,大脑,物质,身体,苦与恶……内阴外阳,比较明显,常常迷惑我们
本真,本明,情感,心血,能量,心灵,乐与善.....内阳外阴,是个隐藏的秘密,常常被我们遗忘遗
漏
先贴个标签:不可知论+宿命论
过分强调了宿命,没有强调这命到底是怎么定的,老天爷到底是怎么安排的是不可知的。
焉知上帝没有给我们自由意志。
何谓自由意志?在我看来,就是个人偏好,个人好恶。
例如我爱吃酸的。很难改变,相当固执。
好好色,恶恶臭,毋自欺。
佛家强调“至道无难,唯嫌拣择”,不能挑食。
认为对境不动,不被境所左右,就是自由。
我觉得这是精神胜利法。曾经帮助我渡过难熬的日子。
但是我到底还是不能骗自己,除非睡熟了,不做梦,乃至将来死了或寂灭了,我还是挑食的。
什么都不挑,给什么吃什么,岂不成了牵线木偶?丧失了自我,活死人一个。
有人说“因为自律所以自由”我说“因为固执,自傲,自尊,所以自由”
信愿行,信念第一。不能固执己见,哪来的信念。
知道自己的固执与自私,方能宽容他人的固执与自私。
慧能:只见自己的是非,不见他人的是非。
他人的是非是他人自己的信念,有什么错。
以自己的是非,自以为无私,自以为公正,自以为客观,自以为全面……去评判他人,才是错。
更确切地说,小声评说也无不可,大声指责乃至要求对方改成你的是非你的好恶你的口味,岂不过分?
不过,如果你的信念决定了对你来说是有大是大非的,那么估计你也忍不住。
都是命啊!
我也不是生来就爱吃酸的。是我的经历决定的。
经历,历史,过去,都是已经发生了的,
要想改变,只能把握当下了
不仅不能不抉择,还应冷静慎重认真地抉择
尤其是与信念有关的抉择
曾有人问我:人怎么可能战胜天呢?
当时我回答不了。
现在我有点知道了。
人定胜天。不是身定坐定禅定,也不是单纯地定在某个念或不念,
而是要坚定信念,坚定意志,同样不会轻易被顺逆祸福所左右,同样自由(除非你的信念所系就是个人的祸福)
,但是不会失去自我与属于自我的最珍贵的真情实感
一切有为法,如梦幻泡影。如露亦如电,应作如是观
否定的是“有为法”,没有否定“如是观”
下面这个故事摘自知乎专栏“迷思印度”
还记得仙人那罗陀(Narada)么?梵天的亲儿子曾经在此前那篇写象鼻神的文章里出现,正如他彼时挑拨湿婆一家表现的那样,他是一位不那么安生的仙人:知乎专栏
他的生命源自梵天的意识,更精确一点,源自梵天的意识中那些不安与扰乱,所以这位仙人始终扮演着躁动的角色,他不停地质疑万物的规律,永远充满好奇,始终在追寻世界的其他可能性。
这天,他完成了虔敬的祷告后,毗湿奴的声音回响在脑海里:仙人啊,你研习吠陀,冥想修行,行遍天地,满怀智慧,却无法获得内心的安宁。请让我予以你赐福,平息你的躁动。
我要如何才能看透这个世界呢?那罗延天啊,请为我解释你的摩耶,告诉我“幻”的秘密。
很简单,你跳入门口的池塘中去吧。
毗湿奴的声音戛然而止,那罗陀起身一头钻到了水里。
从池塘里走出来后,万物轮转,一切都变了。那罗陀发现自己变成了一位公主,站在贝拿勒斯的皇宫里。记忆忽然模糊,她忘记了自己曾是谁,脑海里所有关于那罗陀的记忆彷如隔世般遥远。花样年华的公主与邻国的王子和亲,不久又成为了王后,生下了一群小王子,从此过上了幸福快乐的生活。
然而,她的夫君与父亲之间的关系却不断交恶,不久之后,在贝拿勒斯城外的恒河岸边,爆发了一场血战。战争中所有的男人都杀红了眼,最后这场被诅咒的战役成了一次大屠杀。公主的夫君、儿子、父亲、兄弟悉数阵亡。
葬礼上,她的父亲、夫君、孩子以及兄弟们的骸骨被一排排陈列在火葬柴堆上,大火熊熊燃烧,一切化为灰烬。她哭泣,呐喊着投入火堆,我的孩子,我的孩子。然而烈焰将她包围的时候,却一点也不灼热,反而透着丝丝凉意,火海像冷水一般柔软将她包围。
那罗陀呛了一口水,抬起了头。他浑身湿透,眼前只有那一池水和隐居所,却忍不住阵阵哽咽。毗湿奴的声音又出现在耳边:
你的孩子是谁,你缅怀的亡者又在哪里?这就是我的摩耶,充满苦痛、凄凉、诅咒的深渊,即使是湿婆都逃不过幻的迷离(还记得湿婆与萨蒂的故事么),你又如何参悟“幻”呢?
请问:如果一切皆幻,那么那罗陀的“哽咽”或泪水是不是幻?他自己以及他自己付出的真情是不是幻?
当年有人要我发誓修炼无为法。我很犹豫,因为怕遇到了骗子。
后来想通了。即便假设他们都是假的又有什么关系,因为我是真的。
戏是假的,看戏的我们是真的,我们被感动,从而发愿并付诸行动,所有的付出哪里有半点虚假。这行在路上一路无常无住无限的风景就是“常乐我净”之正果。
我们常常过于关注眼前的世界,而忘了反观自己。
怎样理解“因地不真 果招迂曲”?
有人说持咒念佛求世间种种福报是因地不真? 谢谢
出自:《大佛顶首楞严经》卷第六 [四种清净明诲]
阿难。如是世界六道众生,虽则身心无杀盗淫,三行已圆,若大妄语,即三摩地不得清净,成爱见魔,失如来种。所谓未得谓得,未证言证。或求世间尊胜第一。谓前人言,我今已得须陀洹果,斯陀含果,阿那含果,阿罗汉道,辟支佛乘,十地地前诸位菩萨。求彼礼忏,贪其供养。是一颠迦,销灭佛种。如人以刀断多罗木。佛记是人永殒善根,无复知见。沈三苦海,不成三昧。我灭度后,敕诸菩萨及阿罗汉,应身生彼末法之中,作种种形,度诸轮转。或作沙门白衣居士,人王宰官,童男童女,如是乃至淫女寡妇,奸偷屠贩,与其同事,称赞佛乘,令其身心,入三摩地。终不自言,我真菩萨,真阿罗汉,泄佛密因,轻言末学。唯除命终,阴有遗付。云何是人,惑乱众生,成大妄语。汝教世人,修三摩地,后复断除诸大妄语。是名如来,先佛世尊,第四决定,清净明诲。是故阿难。若不断其大妄语者,如刻人粪为栴檀形,欲求香气,无有是处。我教比丘,直心道场,于四威仪,一切行中,尚无虚假。云何自称,得上人法。譬如穷人,妄号帝王,自取诛灭。况复法王,如何妄窃。因地不真,果招纡曲。求佛菩提,如噬脐人,欲谁成就。若诸比丘,心如直弦,一切真实,入三摩地,永无魔事。我印是人,成就菩萨,无上知觉。如我所说,名为佛说。不如此说,即波旬说。
趙慶光答得不错。关键在于“毋自欺”。
骗别人容易,骗自己难。
信别人(某个神圣)容易,信自己难。
然而,归根结底,还是要信自己。还是要拷问自己的信念何在。
凭什么那么相信这个神圣?为什么这么相信自己的判断?
到底信的是谁?到底该信谁?
对于人生来说,信愿行,信念是第一因,
由信念决定的心愿想法,决定了我们的行动。
行在路上的风景就是人生之果。
人人都有自己的信念。例如“人生苦短及时行乐”。于是其果不仅在于找到的乐子,更在于为找乐子付出的辛苦。个中滋味,冷暖自知。
而根据我的经验,最动摇我们的信念的未必是不同的观点。
各种经典各种理论各种解读我们都可以拿来为我所用。
最动摇我们信念的是顺境逆境,福兮祸兮的转换。
为此《信心铭》教了我们个无分别无差别视之的方法。
我觉得不错。据说修炼“对境不动”还能通神。
但是这种精神胜利法差不多练练能应付命运的捉弄就够了。
莫求极致。
如果真炼成了不仁的天地,灭了人欲的天理,无情的弗人的“佛”
即便神通广大,连“好好色,恶恶臭”都没有了,活着还有什么味道?
《大学》所谓诚其意者,毋自欺也。始恶恶臭,如好好色
只要活着,在生活,睁着眼品尝生命之果,就有个人之好恶,就有我之私欲。自以为无私,指责别人有私,是最大的私欲。只有深度睡眠时,乃至将来寂灭涅槃时,才无我之私欲。
如果一个人连恩义都要看破看穿,我是不敢交这种朋友的。
心平何劳持戒,行直何用修禅。
恩则孝养父母,义则上下相怜。
让则尊卑和睦,忍则众恶无喧。
若能钻木出火,淤泥定生红莲。
苦口的是良药,逆耳必是忠言。
改过必生智慧,护短心内非贤。
日用常行饶益,成道非由施钱。
菩提只向心觅,何劳向外求玄。
听说依此修行,西方只在目前。
(《坛经》)
现在,我们可能受美国文化的影响,都想成为人生赢家。
我看美国杂志《TIME》,上面有个专栏,专门罗列最近美国社会的WINNER是谁或哪个产品之类的事物,
LOSER又是哪些。
我们中国人过去是喜欢把人分为好人坏人的,是不以成败论英雄的。
在我看来,《厚黑学》其实是篇讽刺的文章,作者是看不起这些靠脸皮厚心肠黑上位的历史上的所谓成
功人士的。
更讽刺的是,作者肯定没想到,会有那么多人认真地将这个"厚黑学"奉为人生哲学。
因为越来越多的人认为还是输赢更重要,目的更重要。
为了实现目的,可以不择手段。
我也认为目的很重要。
问题是我们的目的是什么?成为“人生赢家”?
怎么才算“人生赢家”?是由《TIME》之类的众人之口决定的吗?
以我看,归根结底,还是由我们自己决定的。
我们自己设定了目标,达到了我们就是赢家。
如果我们还要顾及悠悠众生之口,怎么做到“脸皮厚心肠黑”呢?
每个人各有各的理想,愿望,欲念,……,
无需统一。我也不打算推销我的人生目的。
因为首先没需求,没买家。再则,我自己也没想清楚我到底要什么。
你们就不同了。假设你们很清楚自己要什么。那么怎么达到目的,成为赢家呢?
想赢就要靠兵法。
《孙子兵法》教导我们要出奇制胜。
所谓奇,不是神奇之奇,神兵突降,借东风之类的。
而是奇数偶数之奇。也就是预备队。
两军相遇,如果实力相差太大,一方早就望风而逃或望风而降了,根本打不起来。
要避实击虚,就要擅长运用预备队。
双方势均力敌,在合适的地点,合适的时间(情报很重要),抓住机会,出奇兵,把预备队都用上,集
中兵力,用在一个点上,才能以实击虚,一举而胜。
为什么国共内战会出现一边倒的局面?我认为,从张灵甫的灭亡过程就
可以看出。为什么他会陷入重围?因为他要找对方的主力决战(不懂避实击虚,战略错误。可能是因为
情报不明,造成过于自信)。为什么要找?说明情报不明。
人生没有那么复杂。人生的兵力就是时间。大家的时间都差不多。
(相差太多的资源不用讨论了,全靠投胎。)
所谓预备队,就是空余的时间。
那么我们该集中攻克哪个点呢?什么是最重要的决定性的那一点呢?
果是由因决定的。那么什么是人生的“第一因”呢?
(待续)
记得有人这么评论中国电影:兴高采烈地自暴自弃。 以我目睹的来看,绝不止是电影。 (佛,唯我独尊,哪来的自卑?)
如果我是投资者,要寻找有潜力的新科技,我应该不会去搞玄学,除非我是个赌徒。 如果我不是,只是侃大山,我会说除了能像电或半导体那样使我们进一步精确使用能量的科技,都是浮云,没发明也许更好。
我只是随便举个例子而已。 土共及其支持者普遍自卑。 不是习一尊的一个人的问题。
不管不顾只要爽,都是破罐破摔的表现.
不用怀疑,韭菜们不是股东。 公有共产,消灭私有,消灭资本,无所谓股东。 都是集体的,国家的,(及其代表人,即领导们的) 按票分配,按码分配,就是恩赐。 如果不是计划的能力有限,根本不需要货币或金融。 现在有AI 或量子计算机了,他们(郭嘉们,不止习或薄)觉得该不忘初心,继续共产了。 目前由于种种原因,有点受挫,等缓过劲来,又会有人用烧书之类的表忠心了. 所谓按需分配,并不难。乔布斯说得好,人不知道自己要什么。也许通过系统的教育,人是甚至会认为饿死也很好的,辟谷成仙了。
一般网络小说都是爽文。 说明读者在生活中是不怎么爽,或很难爽的。
然而有的人,本该很爽了,却还嫌不够。 例如毛住进了中南海,还在说缺,缺东宫与西宫。
习为什么要强调亲自指挥亲自部署? 大约也是因为一想到有可能被亲自去武汉的李克强埋没了而大不爽。
我认为这与他们的自卑有关。 真贵族是不用证明自己的。 他们反而会自嘲。也不会在乎有人批评自己,去号召什么党媒姓党。
他们甚至会去自虐。 有位黑人脱口秀主持人调侃白人去巴厘岛体验穷人的生活,说我们只要回忆一下过去就知道了。
毛在北大的记忆估计不会美好。习在他的圈子里原本也是个边缘人士。
阶层未必决定思想,或思想的全部。何况网上发言常常过于夸张。而连毛与习等人都自卑,何况他人
科举可以算中国式选举。 选的也是政务官或官, 而不是吏,或事务官。
公务员考试选的是后者,并不是当代科举。 高考也不是。只能做博士,不能做官。
当今官或政务官的产生,靠的是伯乐制,家臣制。
也就是说,在许多硬件方面中国已现代化,甚至可算后现代。在政务官产生这方面还不如宋朝。
现代化的一个特点就是陌生人的分工协作。不靠血缘,裙带,同学,朋党之类的人身依附关系。
简单吐槽而已,不参预学术
也就是说我低估了人的自卑。真有支黑。whatever。我已经没兴趣了
是不是反串已不重要。就冲太恶心,合该先自屠为敬
死皮赖脸。何不自屠
支黑这种德性,何不自屠
我管你怎么怎么。越说越像
声称自己是中文好到母语水平的异族,是很可笑的。 不是没有,有的话会这么仇恨? 再假设有,会出现在这么小众的地方? 费这么大劲,说这种鬼话,就是为了水贴,淹了这个反贼论坛,维护你们的主子?
这当然也有可能。
还有一个可能,就是有样学样,自己不知道自己在干什么。
无法一一甄别。
也只好抱歉了。
太辣眼睛。
我也来玩一玩水贴顶贴。
他们越跳脚越费力与我辩,就越证明就是这么回事。 (待续) 如果不是真粉红,只是土共下属的水军,那也就谈不上什么高级了。 (待续)
这么长。累不累?对我来说,更倾向于用母语为界。而且我只是泛淡。没在乎谁会入座。
清零不为防疫,就是借此搞路线斗争,既然已经大胜,几乎就是全习班了,就不想搞了,(说不定还想出去显摆显摆),只是不好解释怎么突然停了,白纸就是及时雨。 不到财政崩溃,是不会锁国,但趋势还是比较明显的。梧桐也是个借口,胜负都无所谓,威望什么的都是浮云。借此转为按码分配各取所赐的共产主义,就从此名正言顺高枕无忧了。说不定不会太惨,至少还能去周边国家现现眼。
我估计不是因为白纸,或者说白纸反而给了他借坡下驴的机会。 还是因为财政。 如果财政恶化到难以维持暴力机器,也未必会再市场经济化, 反而会转向先军经济,战时共产主义。 已经在做舆论准备了。 (因为要配合西方,演好军工共同体的公敌)
辛亥时商会是有自己的武装的。日本陆军里的土包子也早死了,其余的知道资源在南洋。 中国地大物薄,最富裕的就是廉价劳动力。欧美,包括俄,其利益主要在于把黄祸围堵住。
怎么倒台?怎么分裂?多余的担心。
最糟糕的未必是核秋天之类的废土,而是死水一谭,或半死不活,一直拖着倒不了。我们正走在这康庄大道上。
新加坡也不完美,所以我们就有理由更糟? 其实,以土共的德性,见光就死了。所以需要先赦免自己。
可以渐进。不用着急。只要扭转越来越暗箱,市场的信心就不一样了。
但是,赦免法这第一步如果迈不出去,那也只是笼子大一点而已。 笼子里的言论自由新闻自由,无法真正监督政府,那么保持平衡逐渐开放透明,等等等等,都可以免谈了。
为什么无论说什么,就是100%? 不用全公开。但也不能越来越暗箱操作。方便了谁摸鱼?
其他不要紧,公开透明最重要。 集权或分封,法治或自治,都可以。 但必须尽可能地公开透明。 新加坡能做到,那是因为真的是精英。 土共屁股不干净,需要先立个自己赦免自己的方法。 但是又不是真贵族,自卑得很,摸不下面子立这种法。 所以只能奔向按码分配各取所赐党恩浩荡领袖万岁的西朝鲜之路了。
而且现在我也算是实修派了。
这个离题了。简单来说。主要就是我发现连我才初中的儿子都听得懂我在说什么。还能进一步提出问题。这说明我以前得到的那些反馈,什么看不懂,什么你语文没学好所以我看不懂,都不是什么老实的认真的发言。