文章
时政

美国州总检察长为什么要民选?

陈士杰  ·  2020年10月31日 打倒共产党!打倒习近平!

贺锦丽当过加州民选的总检察长。

总检察长应该是州政府内阁的一部分,应该是州政府的一个厅长。

这个职位应该是州长任命即可,为什么要民选?

联邦司法部长也不是民选的啊。

菜单
  1. 邹韬奋 外逃贪官CA
    邹韬奋   虽然韬光养晦,亦当奋起而争(拜登永不为奴:h.2047.one)

    各州各自决定。有些人喜欢多一些民主代议,让官员直接对人民负责,有些人喜欢责任内阁,让首长背锅。

  2. 爱狗却养猫 饭丝
    爱狗却养猫  

    The origins of the elected prosecutor

    ...fairness and efficiency concerns were largely absent from the debates over whether to make prosecutors elected. Instead, supporters of elected prosecutors were responding to governors and legislators who used the appointment system for political patronage. As prosecutors gained discretionary power over criminal prosecutions, mid-nineteenth-century political reformers believed it was crucial to remove prosecutors from partisan politics. Many also hoped elected prosecutors would be more accountable to the voters and the local communities they served. Not long after prosecutors became elected, however,prosecutors quickly became involved in and co-opted by partisan politics.

    “公平与效率并不是检察官是否应选举产生的主要考虑。支持检察官民选的人认为,州长和立法者通过任命检察官在政治上拉关系。由于检察官具有对刑事诉讼的自由裁量权,十九世纪中叶的政治改革者们认为,让检察官脱离党派政治至关重要。许多人还希望民选的检察官能更多地向选民和当地社区负责。然而,检察官民选后没多久,就涉入了党派政治,并由党派推举名额。”

    总结:初衷是为了“去党派政治”,然而完全没有用。

  3. 陈士杰   打倒共产党!打倒习近平!

    @爱狗却养猫 #110866

    政客都不可能是“没有党派立场”的,就连法官都有左右派之分,检察长更不可能中立了。

    所以永远不要试图寻找中立,而是像美国大法官一样,左派右派都有,各派都有找一种平衡一样的中立。