民进党双赢啊,赢两次,抗中保台,赢得了选票,偷摸摸去大陆,人民币也赚了,又赢一次
下次选举继续用抗中保台这一招,一招鲜,吃遍天
民进党双赢啊,赢两次,抗中保台,赢得了选票,偷摸摸去大陆,人民币也赚了,又赢一次
下次选举继续用抗中保台这一招,一招鲜,吃遍天
震惊,民进党团总召已投共,这不是跟赖清德投共差不多了嘛
连金主的负面新闻都敢发,不封你封谁
还不老实交代,等下让你尝下赵家人的手段,逼你吃屎喝尿,电蚊拍电生殖器,木棍捅肛门,黄豆塞屁眼
这里面没有涉及到大陆的一些社会议题,像是赌神2里面有个千赌湖,就影射1994年千岛湖发生的抢劫杀害台湾游客的事情,当时台湾的李登辉批评大陆对此事的处理方式
还有就是赌神被抓到千赌湖派出所以后,被公安殴打,后来警长来了,批评警员不尊重人权
后来警长莫名其妙被带到台湾以后,非常开心,暗示大陆的一些人民对于台湾还是非常向往,还有警长对台湾人说,大陆也有七龙珠可以看,表示台湾人并不清楚大陆改革开放的实际情况
反正这部剧还有很多梗,很有意思,现在是不会再有这种片子了,你可以去看大陆的一部片子,叫做 天注定 ,这部片子基本描述了最近十几年的各种社会矛盾以及热点新闻事件,这部片子是被老共永久封杀的
老共的专制统治会加剧这种情况,据 经济学人 杂志报道,自从2012年一号上台以来,到2021年,已有69.3万人在别国申请政治庇护,当环境不适宜的时候,强者会选择迁徙,弱者会停止繁衍
香港已经不是鬼佬统治的香港了,已经被无产阶级专政了,没有言论自由,还能拍出什么好电影呢?像是以前的赌神2等97年之前的电影,对于大陆的描写还是入木三分,现在不行了
小二已经吃过牢饭了
发国难财可以的
这应该是镇反运动的时候,毛说的话吧,毛确实是有人类历史以来最大的杀人魔,可以比得上100个刚村宁次,畑俊六,土肥原贤二组合
挺帅的一小伙儿,为啥找不到对象
有钱能使鬼推磨,何况是冻结党纲这种东西,像类似国民党的邱毅,老共给的钱不要太多。
嘴上全是主义,心里都是生意。最近台湾的邦交国又被老共抢走几个,这些小国家领导人在习皇面前,说几句话就给几十亿美金,这种诱惑抵挡不住
鸣禁党果然是搅屎棍
这个职业不危险吧,只要闷身发大财就好了。像李克强或者任志强这种忍不住要为天下苍生一呼的,结果也很明显了
这都啥啊,孙大炮1924年就死了,那时候还没发生918事变呢
那是毛远新资历不够,要是毛再多活几年,把毛远新培养好了,还是有可能的,后来就退而求其次,传位给湖南老乡华国锋了
只是被迫演戏罢了,老百姓自己的肚子可明白的很呢。就像老毛说的,他比较喜欢右派,讨厌左派,因为左派太虚伪,但毛的实际做法和说的是两码事
柯建铭是不是那个在立法院说,现在占领立法院的是习近平,是那个人吗
民进党的赖清德和高嘉瑜的党内地位能一样吗
不一样啊,有级别之分啊,像是北京晚报这些级别肯定比楚天都市报高啊,当然最高的就是属于中央电视台这些了,像是南方周末这些广东媒体又不太一样,广东处在改革开放前沿,不过南方周末虽然是广州市委宣传部主管,不过因为敢于抨击时事,已经被中共中央修理过了,南方周末以前也主要是报道广州以外的事情,广州本地的也比较少报道。
中共内部很讲究级别的,就举咸阳市政府食堂为例好了,政府里面可能有好几个食堂,普通公务员是一个食堂,常委,副书记是一个食堂,书记又是另外一个食堂,类比到台北市政府,那就是蒋万安是单独一个食堂,算国民党傅总召是台北市书记的话,他又是另外一个食堂
18年左右那时候网贷很流行的,几千人民币随便贷款,也不用还的,反正是高利贷,后来出现了校园裸贷事情,老共开始处理网贷,不过现在还是有很多网贷,都是一些大网贷公司,像是微信的微粒贷,还有就是支付宝的花呗借呗什么的了,貌似支付宝公司已经被老共接管了,变成国企了?
这个极目新闻没啥名气啊,它的前身是湖北的楚天都市报,中国可以关注的两个共产党办的媒体,一个是新京报,另外一个是澎湃新闻,中国就北京和广东的媒体有点影响力,其他都不行
社科就和政治一样密不可分,你不关心政治,政治就来关心你,你不关心社科,社科就来关心你
这个真相也不得而知了,反正媒体也不会报道,如果真是饿死的,那不是给现行的社会主义制度抹黑嘛,就像三年大饥荒的时候派民兵守住村的入口,不让农民出去讨饭吃,民国的时候尚且还有讨饭的自由,死也是死在讨饭的路上
可惜把你生晚了,你要是在文革时期,可以加入五人帮的
只要能去捡垃圾就不会饿死,长衫脱不下终害己
文革时代,学校都停办了,后来大学还是开设了部分学科,人文类的学科不能开设,社会科学更加不行,虽然老毛自己很爱研究社科类问题,但不允许别人研究,文革时期招收的大学生也就是熟知的工农兵大学生
你觉得习近平这种工农兵大学生跟胡锦涛或者民国时候受大学教育的江泽民比怎么样?
社会科学本来就是被老共限制的,前不久习大帝就抓了一个中国社科院的研究员,老毛时代比较出名的事情就是中国社科院的一个研究员把自己打扮成黑人闯马里驻中国大使馆,后来被毛枪决了
社会科学研究的范围太广了,有一部分就是群体性事件,中国每年发生很多起反抗老共的事件,像前不久涿州泄洪事件,民众冲击霸州政府,还有就是新冠时期的白纸运动,前几天白纸运动纪录片(乌鲁木齐中路)导演被老共判了三年半,为他辩护的人权律师已经流亡海外,还有就是外媒最喜欢谈的六四都是社会科学研究的一部分
一些报道真实新闻,对老共提出批评的例如南方周末,以及羊城晚报遭到老共的整肃,还有就是香港有个当代中国研究所,也被老共修理了,领导部门大换血,他们关注的很多也是社会科学关注的问题
中国社科院也有个近代历史研究所,不过现在的研究员也只能发一些党棍文章,像是中共延安时期种鸦片来获得军饷,还有就是勾结日本人打击国民党军队,这些研究员估计也知道,但是谁敢公开发表,发表了估计就要被抓了。
还有就是被重判七年的编程随想,他发的很多文章也是社科类,比如所谓的香港暴动问题分析等等
是女的就行,不要挑
1912年那时候也不算死吧,只是被宫保解散了而已,三民主义的精神还在,不然后面怎么重组呢
中华民国大陆政府已经灭亡了,但是在澳洲的华人又搞了一个中华民国大陆政府,还可以发中华民国的护照
早些年中国还有个中国泛蓝联盟,宣扬三民主义的,后来主要领导人被老共抓捕,现在已基本停止活动
看纸质书比较好,中国出版的大部分是洗脑书籍,尤其是历史类的书籍
你可以去找一只鹿儿,反正她也在台湾
这感觉跟毛发动文革差不多啊,用红卫兵打掉自己的政敌
2047肯定是被老共盯上的,GFW屏蔽了这个网站
台湾看爱奇艺还要vpn?爱奇艺也没啥好看的,大都是洗脑烂剧,不过2016年之前的有些剧还是蛮好看的
中国社保入不敷出了,让民众交钱补窟窿,这个个人养老金大概率到退休的时候无法取出来
为啥除了陈永康
有些宗教确实不要传播的好,像是穆斯林这种,不过基督教这种还是可以让他传播的。
主要是人一旦有信仰就不好控制了,这是共产党不想看到的
2024年11月共产党迫害基督徒的新闻
蚌埠活石归正教会四位同工被控“诈骗罪”一案开庭,家属被拒旁听
大主教萨尔瓦多·科迪莱昂(Salvatore Cordileone)以题为“为什么马克思主义和新马克思主义政权害怕宗教”的主题演讲拉开讨论的序幕。
福建莆田普光教会主日敬拜受冲击,洪秋勇、吴各税、宋志光等六位牧者同工被扣押
中共当局公然在教堂内设立 “反邪教警示教育基地”
快讯:陕西西安范彦民牧师被警方带走拘留
受害者家长把医院一个执勤的辅警打死了
那只是训政阶段,后来要走向宪政民主的,就像现在的台湾一样
现在中国才真的是党国,但是中共从来也不讲自己是党国。当然,中共也从来不会讲自己是独裁。
00后女孩代孕流产 黑产链再引伦理热议
中国一名00后女孩被诱骗进入非法代孕产业,怀孕5个月后流产的经历在社交媒体上并迅速转载,引发了有关女性权利和社会不平等的激烈讨论。
(德国之声中文网)今年22岁的张婧因打工收入微薄,接触到了打着“招募试药志愿者”的幌子、实则是从事卖精卖卵代孕的中介。2022年她和中介商定以2.5万元的报酬“捐卵”。两年后经济困难的张婧再次与中介取得联系,并决定以3万元(约合4152美元)的报酬“出租子宫”进行受孕。
如果能够顺利产下婴儿,张婧将获得总计24万元人民币的报酬。然而,张婧在怀孕五个月时遭遇严重并发症,不得不进行引产手术。
错,我不同意你的看法,这个论坛是私有制论坛,管理员想干嘛就干嘛,不受任何约束
习近平裁撤公务员跟习近平把自己女儿嫁给农民工难度是差不多的。
共产党自从成立边区政府到现在就从来没裁过公务员,刚成立边区那会儿,没钱了,就去打土豪就行了,现在没钱了,搞几个资本家,然后再增加税收,多开发几个罚款的项目就好了,现在又有了远洋捕捞项目,嘎嘎赚钱
Online services are not released software, but in regard to all the bad aspects, using a service is equivalent to using a copy of released software. In particular, a service can be designed to mistreat the user, and many services do that. However, we do not list instances of malicious dis-services here, for two reasons. First, a service (whether malicious or not) is not a program that one could install a copy of, and there is no way at all for users to change it. Second, it is so obvious that a service can mistreat users if the owner wishes that we hardly need to prove it.
许多在线服务会不合理对待用户,但我们这里并不会加以说明。原因有二,一是服务并不像是程序那样可以复制,用户也不可能去改变它。二是,服务的所有者可以随意根据其好恶来对待用户。
When a web site provides access to a service, it very likely sends nonfree JavaScript software to execute in the user's browser. Such JavaScript code is released software, and it's morally equivalent to other nonfree apps. If it does malicious things, we want to mention them here.
当你访问一个网站的时候,它就很有可能在用户的浏览器里执行JavaScript脚本。
中国现在拖欠工资的情况还是挺普遍的,但是好像没什么维权的手段,劳动仲裁基本上很难维权,又没有自己的工会,倒是有共产党管理的工会,不过感觉没啥作用
巴哈论坛还是不错的,充满了和谐的气息,ptt论坛网络酸民太多,如果开放注册,中国必定攻陷ptt
国企可是共产党用2000万颗人头换来的,怎么能让私企发展起来呢,必须做大做强国企才是符合习近平中国特色社会主义思想的
健委silverball总统大选的时候投了谁
Apple reportedly had objections to what Jon Stewart said in his video program — it canceled the show after he had criticized China, and something the article describes as "AI". (It could be that what he criticized was actually large language models, which may be an important issue but are not "intelligence".)
据报道,Apple对Jon Stewart在视频节目中的言论表示反对——在他批评中国以及AI后,节目就被取消了(他批评的实际上是大语言模型,并不是人工智能)
We should protect the media from censorship by commercial interests by not allowing companies that make or sell other products to be involved in the business of making or distributing audio or video programs.
I expect that Apple does much worse things than this in its distribution of video programs. For instance, I suspect it requires viewers to run nonfree software with DRM, compels them to identify themselves, and imposes an immoral "antisocializing" contract where you promise not to share a copy with anyone else. (Not coincidentally, this resembles the bad things that commercial e-books do.)
我预测Apple在发布视讯节目上会更加的糟糕。举例来说,我怀疑它可能要求用户运行携带有DRM的非自由软件,强迫他们自我认证,强迫签署一份不道德的“反社会”的合约,内容就是你要保证不跟其他人分享拷贝(无独有偶,这就像电子书那样做的一样)
Apple demonstrates the arbitrariness of its censorship by blocking an app that tells people with text messages when US drone attacks kill civilians.
有一个app上有美国无人机造成平民死亡的信息,然后Apple就封禁了这个app
The author said that this app was meant to raise awareness. I hope Apple's censorship of it raises awareness.
Apple deauthorized a Wikileaks access application, using censorship to support censorship.
However, that doesn't justify Apple's censorship.
然而,这也不能说明Apple的监控是合法的
Steve Jobs used Apple's censorship power to impose prudery on the net, and this is part of why Stumblr is now deleting everything that won't be rated G.
Steve Jobs用Apple的审查权力来禁止掉网络中的色情信息,这也就说明了为什么Stumblr删除了一切不属于G级别的信息
I tried to view a Tumblr page, but its contents did not appear. It seemed to be totally dependent on nonfee Javascript code. Whatever may disappear from Tumblr, I personally will not miss it. Nonetheless, I am concerned about this issue because creeping prudish censorship is dangerous in general; we should fight it in general.
我想要浏览一个Tumblr页面,但是它的内容没有出现,看起来这个网站是需要运行非自由的Javascript代码。不管我错过了Tumblr上面任何东西,我都不在意,尽管如此,我还是很担心这个广泛的正经审查制度,我们应该进行抵制
Let us therefore invite Apple to go fuck itself and post a selfie of that act on Stumblr.
让我们邀请Apple操它自己,并在Stumblr上放一张自拍照
Apple surely did this because of threats from China. (We are not supposed to suggest that a "good corporate citizen" would uphold freedom at the cost of profits.) But the reason Apple could do this is that it gave itself censorship power over applications for iMonsters, through the proprietary code of the operating system.
Apple在中国的威胁之下,当然会这样做(我们不应该觉得Apple公司会放弃利润去坚持自由).但是Apple做这些事情的动机是为了拥有监控iMonster用户的权力
Offering a checking service as an option could be useful and would not be wrong. Requiring users to get Apple's approval is tyranny. Apple says the check will only look for malware (not counting the malware that is part of the operating system), but Apple could change that policy step by step. Or perhaps Apple will decide that helping Hong Kong protesters constitutes malware.
提供可选的检查服务可能会有帮助,至少不会是错的,要求用户得到Apple的许可那就是暴政。Apple自己说的是检查只会查找恶意软件(不包括操作系统中的恶意软件),但是Apple能够一步步的改变策略,或许Apple会判定帮助香港抗议者的软件也是恶意软件。
Apple is responsible for its actions, but one general problem that tends to encourage this behavior is the fact that companies are multinational. China will always find a way to censor companies that do business in China. And so will many other countries.
Apple应该为其行为负责,但是为什么会导致这样行为的一个普遍的原因就是公司一般都是跨国公司,中国总能找到方法去审查这些在中国做生意的公司,其他国家的政府也差不多是这样做的
I think we must limit a forum to doing actual business in one single country. It could allow people to post and read without asking them what countries they are in. This way, other countries would have no levers over the company, no way to make it censor anything.
我认为我们必须将论坛服务限制在某一个国家,这样的话,阅读和发帖的时候就不必在意用户是在哪个国家。用这种方式的话,其他国家就拿公司没有办法,也就不能要求它审查任何东西
In 2021, Apple has been shifting more production to China.
在2021年,Apple已经更多生产转移至中国
Spying
间谍软件
Using the lever of "You have a choice, but unless you say yes, your old activities will stop working" is something that Apple has done before, with malicious "upgrades". Apple ostensibly doesn't force people to accept the new nasty thing; it just punishes them if they don't.
Apple's Capitulation to China's VPN Crack-Down Will Return to Haunt it at Home.
The Apple CEO met with the troll and said: "Tim Cook from Apple, I'm here to talk to the President-elect about the things we can do to help you achieve your stated goal."
Reevaluating Apple's reputation for good design: design for nonrepairability is not good design.
重新评估Apple拥有良好设计的声誉:不易修复的设计不是一个好的设计
Apple is a major patent aggressor. Here's a rather absurd patent that Apple will surely use against other mobile computers. This joins many other patents which Apple is already using to attack free software. Apple是专利的侵犯者,Apple用一个相当荒谬的专利去与其他移动电脑做竞争,Apple用专利去攻击自由软件
Apple devices lock users in solely to Apple services by being incompatible with all others, both the ethical ones and the unethical ones.
Apple设备因为与其他所有设备都不兼容,所以用户只能使用Apple提供的服务,不管道德与否
When Apple suspects a user of fraud, it judges the case secretly and presents the verdict as a fait accompli. The punishment to a user found guilty is being cut off for life, which more-or-less cripples the user's Apple devices forever. There is no appeal.
My response to any disservice which asks me to accept of those forms of mistreatment is to invite it to jump in the lake.
要我去接受这些侵害权益的条款,那我的回应是让它投湖去吧
Apple censors information about abortion providers.
Apple审查堕胎机构的信息
As of 2015, Apple systematically bans apps that endorse abortion rights or would help women find abortions.
自2015年起,Apple就系统性的禁止了有关赞成堕胎权力或者帮助女人们找到堕胎机构的相关app
This particular political slant affects other Apple services.
这种政策倾斜也影响了其他Apple服务
People should not do business with Amazon, which mistreats authors, publishers, its workers, and its customers. Ms Lisle's presupposition that the goal of success is all that matters is not admirable.
人们不应该和Amazon做生意,因为Amazon不公正的对待作者、出版商、它自己的工人和顾客。 Apple banned from iTunes the erotic novel, The Proof of the Honey, saying it was because of the cover.
iTunes上禁止The Proof of the Honey这部色情小说,Apple说这是因为封面的问题
Apple censored a game for the iThings called Angry Syrians, which is a political parody of Angry Birds.
Apple审查了一款叫做愤怒的叙利亚民众的游戏,这款游戏是愤怒的小鸟的讽刺性模仿作品
Apple said it was "defamatory or offensive" — to the dictator Assad, apparently.
Apple说这款游戏是“诽谤或者冒犯”的,很明显这是对独裁者Assad说的
Apple cut off access to the app store for Iranian users of iMonsters.
Apple禁止iMonster的伊朗用户访问app商店
The underlying wrong here is that Apple gave itself censorship power over everyone that uses those computers — power that we should not allow anyone to have.
潜在的问题是Apple拥有审查使用其电脑的用户的权力——这种权力本来就不应该允许任何人拥有它
As of 2020, Apple still censors for China — and acts as China's enforcer to make other companies censor for China.
自从2020年起,Apple仍然会中国政府监视用户——它同时也让其他公司替中国政府监视用户
Apple spies on its users, and helps others spy on them.
Apple监视它的用户,同时也帮助其他人监视用户
If you carry a cell phone, it tells Big Brother where you are. Apple wants to hand out the information too.
如果你携带有手机,那么它将会告诉老大哥你的位置。
Apple has outsourced its user data storage in China to a company controlled by the Communist Party of the province of Guizhou
Apple已经把中国用户的数据存储服务外包给贵州共产党控制的一个公司
Apple can track iMonsters even when they are suspended.
即使iMonster程序已经停止了,但是Apple仍然能够追踪
This distributed bluetooth network is said to be "secure", but it is obviously not secure from Apple or from governments that can command Apple's obedience (such as the US and China). 分散式的蓝牙网络据说是“安全”的,但是如果Apple自己调数据或者政府(例如美国和中国)要求Apple提供数据的话,那么显然就是不安全的
The Guardian press seems blissfully unaware of this spying. It even repeats Apple's claims to help users protect their privacy — but only some aspects of their privacy. Just as software developers have redefined "security" to mean "security against everyone but us", Apple is redefining "privacy" to mean "privacy from everyone but us."
卫报出版社并没有意识到这种间谍活动。它甚至认为苹果是在帮助用户保护他们的隐私——隐私中的某些方面。软件开发人定义的“安全”是"security against everyone but us",Apple自己定义隐私是"privacy from everyone but us".
People might want to post comments there (be civil about it!) or send letters to the editor. I am sure there are dozens of publications which could use the same sort of response.
人们或许想要评论(注意文明用语)或者给编辑写信,但我相信这些出版商的回复都是差不多的
Worker abuse
虐待工人
Apple persists in disregarding the widespread blatant abuse of the workers that build its products.
Apple是一个血汗工厂
In 2015, the workers making Apple products in China are still mistreated.
在2015年,Apple中国的工人待遇依然很糟糕
Apple uses sweatshops in China to build its products.
Apple用中国的血汗工厂来制造它的产品
Sweatshops are good for Foxconn (and for Apple), but not for workers.
血汗工厂对富士康(Apple)是好事,但对工人来说未必。
An undercover journalist reports on the horrible conditions in the Foxconn factory that makes iThings: still horrible in 2012.
一名卧底记者报告了富士康iThings制造线的可怕状况,这种状况在2012年依旧存在
Foxconn closed schools and forced the students to work building iThings.
富士康关闭了学校,强迫学生制造iThings
Working conditions at Apple's other Chinese suppliers are even worse than in Foxconn.
Apple在中国的其他供应商的工作环境甚至比富士康的更加糟糕
Today's Apple Pegatron sweatshops are even nastier than the Foxconn sweatshops it used before.
今天苹果的和硕血汗工厂甚至比过去的富士康更加的令人作呕
Just because you're not pregnant, should that make it ok to require you to work 11 hours a day, 6 days a week? Apple is culpable if its products are made by people working a longer workweek than is allowed in the US.
因为你没有怀孕,难道让你一周工作6天,一天工作11个小时就是合理的吗?如果制造苹果产品的工人的一周工作时间比美国法律要求的多,那么苹果就是有问题的
Mistreatment of workers making Apple computers continues in 2014.
制造Apple电脑的工人在2014年待遇仍然糟糕
This is a general injustice, and will continue until the "brand" companies are made legally responsible for treatment of the workers that do their work, just as if they were direct employees of those companies. But that doesn't excuse Apple.
如果这些品牌公司不会因为这样对待工人而受到法律惩处的话,那么这种血汗工厂的情况将继续下去。
Tax avoidance
逃税
Apple practices tax avoidance using loopholes and lobbying.
Apple通过法律漏洞来避税。
Apple pioneered techniques for avoiding the US corporate tax (even though it is far too low) in order to pay next to no tax.
Apple在避税方面造诣很深(虽然税已经很低了),为的是几乎不交税
The loopholes that Apple uses would be closed, if not for the political power of business. "Free trade" treaties give business increased power to block such changes, so we must abolish them to break business's power.
如果没有商业来干预政治的话,那么Apple以前一直利用的法律漏洞将会被堵上。自由贸易政策给了商人很大的权力来阻挡对其不利的改变,所以我们必须取消这些政策来削弱商人的权力
This text was transcribed from a video recording. I can't offer a reference because the web site requires nonfree Javascript code.
这段文字是从一段影片中转录的。因为这个网站需要非自由Javascript代码,所以我就不提供链接了
Cook was angling for a big tax cut for multinational businesses.
Cook在为跨国公司的大幅度减税而去游说
Apple Avoided $40 Billion in Taxes (by lobbying for a tax cut). Now It Wants a Gold Star?
Apple通过游说免交了400亿美金的税。现在它难道想要 a Gold Star?
Right to repair
修理的权力
Apple Is Lobbying Against Your Right to Repair iPhones, New York State Records Confirm. Apple正在游说去除用户自己修理iPhones的权力,纽约州政府确认了这个消息
Apple forbids recyclers of Apple computers from extracting any usable spare parts from them, by imposing nasty contracts. Apple通过恶心人的合约来禁止Apple电脑的回收商从电脑中拿走可用的零件
Apple's conduct should be forbidden by law so that no company can ever do this.
苹果公司的行为应该被法律所禁止,这样就没有公司会受害了
The iPhone 7 has DRM specifically to brick it if anyone other than an authorized repair agent fixes it.
如果不是有苹果认证的修理厂商去修理iPhone7的话,那么它可能会变砖,因为有DRM的缘故。
The term "lock" is inadequate to describe this sort of malware. Let's use other words that show what's really going on.
“lock”这个词语都不足以形容这种类型的恶意软件,可以用另外的词汇去形容。
Apple faces trial in Australia for bricking devices because they had had an "unauthorized" repair.
因为有用户自己修理Apple设备,导致设备变砖,然后Apple就在澳洲被起诉了
Apple machines are built with unusual screws that make it difficult for the owner to take them apart.
Apple机器上的螺丝都很少见,所以用户要拆除它们就变得很困难。
Along with technical barriers, Apple lobbies against "right to repair" laws.
除了技术壁垒之外,苹果还游说反对「维修权」法案
Apple is campaigning against right-to-repair laws that weaken the unjust effect of the DMCA.
Apple正在发起反对「维修权」法的运动,这部法律可以削弱DMCA的影响
Other reasons
其他原因 Apple charges a high price for storage on "Apple's cloud", which turns out to be a cloudy thing: it farms out the data to other companies.
“Apple's cloud”收费高昂,同时Apple还把数据外包给其他公司
Apple iThings pioneered a new level of restricting the users: they were the first general purpose computers to impose censorship over what programs the user can install. Apple practices Digital Restrictions Management in many other ways too.
Apple iThings在限制用户方面达到了一个新的高度:它们的电脑可以监视用户到底装了什么软件。Apple公司也在很多其他方面实践DRM
Ebooks with DRM won't work on an iThing that is jailbroken, due to intentional sabotage by Apple.
因为Apple的故意损坏,带有DRM的电子书就无法在越狱的iThing上使用
E-books with digital handcuffs are products designed to attack your freedom, much like the iThing itself.
带有数字手铐的电子书是侵犯自由的产品,就像iThing一样
Apple exploits the app developers mercilessly, aside from a few stars whose role is to give a misleading impression of what developers can expect.
Apple无情的剥削app开发者
I can't sympathize much with those app developers, since they are making proprietary software. They all deserve to fail. However, that doesn't excuse the way Apple treats them.
我没有对这些app开发者有过多的同情,因为他们在制造专有软件。然而,这不能成为Apple这样对待他们的借口
Apple lures people into the business of developing apps with visions of the great wealth that a few of them get. Most just fail, often losing a substantial investment.
Apple诱导人们开发app,许以他们中的少数人会拥有大量财富的愿景。但是大多数人的投资基本上都是打水漂
Anyone who intentionally develops proprietary software (i.e., does not respect users' freedom) deserves no sympathy, but that doesn't excuse Apple for luring people into it. Some of them would not have tried to develop proprietary software if not for Apple.
任何人如果故意开发专有软件(不尊重用户的自由),那么这种人就不值得同情,但这不应该成为Apple诱导开发者这样做的借口,他们中的一些人其实是不会去开发专有软件的,如果不是为了开发Apple软件的话。
Lots of iThing users complained that they did not want the U2 album "gift" that Apple stuck them with — and that it was hard to delete.
很多的iThing用户抱怨,他们不想要苹果给他们的U2专辑礼物—但又无法删除
These complaints focus on a superficial problem, reflecting the shallow thinking that Apple instills in its users. Ironically, though, this superficial problem reflects a much deeper problem that the complainers have failed to notice: the unjust power that Apple has imposed on whoever uses an iThing or iTunes.
这些抱怨只是专注于表面的问题,反映了Apple灌输给用户的肤浅思维。讽刺的是,这个表面问题引出了抱怨者忽略的一个深层次的问题:那就是Apple强加给iThing或iTunes用户的不正当的权力
Apple turns a blind eye to environment in China.
Apple对中国的环境问题视而不见
Although Apple has joined EPEAT again, it does not cover the iThings — only the Macintosh.
尽管Apple参加了EPEAT,但这只包括Macintosh,并不涉及iThings
Apple practices planned obsolescence for the iBad — in just two years.
Apple在短短的两年内就计划报废iBad
Apple store staff are taught twisted psychological manipulation.
Apple用扭曲的心理价值观教导专卖店的职工
The mere practice of referring to service staff as "geniuses" is dishonest already.
仅仅将服务人员称为「天才」的做法就已经是不诚实的了
Apple stores are cunningly designed theater, somewhat like Disneyland. The employees are all young because people with dependents can't afford the low pay.
Apple专卖店被设计为类似迪士尼乐园的样子。因为给的工资低,所以雇员一般都是没有负担的年轻人
The European Union wants to require small electronic devices to have a standard USB-C charging port. Apple is against it, because it profits from imposed incompatibility.
欧盟要求小型电子设备都有标准的USB-C充电口,但是遭到了Apple的抵制,因为Apple可以从独有的充电口设计中获得利益
Naturally, Apple cites "innovation" as a reason to sell incompatible power adapters. Our society systematically overstates the importance of innovation, because many businesses find that a useful excuse for mistreating users in various ways.
Apple认为销售不兼容的电源适配器是一种创新。我们的社会经常夸大“创新”的重要性,为此许多商人发现这是不公正对待用户的一个非常好的借口