@Ciao ideology研究这边我见到的还很少，其实hacker and painter算是类似的散文集，Hacking Capitalism是通过马克思的观点来研究Hacking，我觉得其实不是很solid，但是也是少有的专著，采访里提到的书可能也算。

其他人知道的话在这留个言，也不甚感激。

@Ciao 现状可能可以看Empire (Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri)，Elephant and Flea, From counter culture to cyberculture

@Ciao 推荐The structural transformation of public sphere，这是一篇社会学博士论文，应该是非常著名的，觉得看懂的话可以大概明白为什么自由主义失效了

@Ciao 也远远超过技术如何改变世界

@Ciao 他思考的问题已经远远超过比特币了，我现在简单总结为信息时代的idealogy，类比自由主义是是资本革命的idealogy。我希望引起注意的更多是这点，比如他提到的书我就很感兴趣。

@Ciao 前半部分不是讨论，是背景介绍。旨在简单介绍为什么这篇访谈值得关注。讨论的话很复杂，没读过几本专著可能连问题都听不懂。旨在引起读者有这么个问题，至于说没说得明白就看缘分了。。。

和很多立大圈子里的同学和学者一样，我也（曾）是一名自由主义者，但liberalism，这一自由主义的直译，从19世纪就逐渐被西方抛弃，被各种各样的新主义代替progressivism, Libertarian socialism, etc而仿佛现在中国的自由派，公共知识分子还在刻舟求剑，想要建立自由主义式的民主自由。可能我了解得并不细，但部分至少说明他们不成体系，没有认识到这个时代的根本问题，仅仅需求复杂问题的简答答案，而这种简单答案往往只能是历史倒退到更蛮荒的时代，而不是促进进步。没有出现新的证据之前，我也会一直保持这种观点。现在我只能说是一个自由主义同情者。同样，我也是集权国家的厌恶者。

承上，现在我觉得中国的问题不仅仅是中国如何取得民主这一问题，而是世界如何建立新的ideology的问题，近些年的trumpism, isolationism, polutism都是表现，所以一直在留意世界各地的动向，并期待建立或找到新的哲学。这篇帖子主要想要分享这篇采访，这是我看见的第一例，以建设性（constructive）的方式，尝试在混乱、集权的地区尝试以新的ideology and technology来建立一个新的社会。

关注比特币的朋友也推荐，Amir的观点是我目前为止看见最中肯的。

不过，我也还没有仔细研究这个人，和叙利亚的事件，所以也可能这是一个坑，请自己有判断能力。

Anarchist hacker Amir Taaki says bitcoin’s boom means it’s on the verge of a collapse

https://qz.com/1192640/anarchist-cryptocurrency-hacker-amir-taaki-says-bitcoin-is-in-a-speculative-bubble/

今天整理了一下中国现在的“天网”监控筹备报道

并没有完备整理，只是把今天看到的搜集起来了。

多数文章都是这篇文章里的链接 China's Surveillance State Should Scare Everyone

一些关于“墙“的报道或网站

The Great Firewall of China: Background A project to inform people about the Great Fire Wall

摄像头监控

Beijing police have covered every corner of the city with video surveillance system In China, Beware: A Camera May Be Watching You

阿里巴巴和微信监控以及关于给每人”评分“的国家计划

China’s Tech Giants Help Beijing Spy on Its People Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020) China’s Nightmarish Citizen Scores Are a Warning For Americans

是好厉害，感觉是颠覆性的技术。可以打开

@Ciao 如果不知道的话推荐Dropbox吧，算是云储存领头羊。最低的套餐大概50/月，1TB，3-4T你要买商业套餐了，大概140左右一个月

没留神，分类错了

Europe Is Back. And Rejecting Trumpism： https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/24/business/europe-trumpism-davos.html

谢谢分享

我也觉得是钓鱼贴

Quote:

For politicians, the striving for power is an unavoidable tool of their trade. Thus the ‘power instinct,' as it is often called, belongs among their normal attributes. However, the sin against the Holy Spirit of their profession begins where this striving for power is separated from the matter in hand and becomes an object purely of self-intoxication instead of something that enters exclusively into the service of their ‘cause.' For ultimately there are only two kinds of mortal sin in the field of politics: the lack of commitment to a cause and the lack of a sense of responsibility that is often, but not always, identical with it. Vanity, the need to thrust oneself center stage, is what is most likely to lead the politician into the temptation of committing either or both of these sins. All the more, as the demagogue is forced to play for ‘effect.' Because he is concerned only with the ‘impression' he is making, he always runs the risk both of turning into an actor and of taking too lightly his responsibility for his own actions. His lack of objectivity leads him to strive for the glittering facade of power, instead of its reality, while his lack of a sense of responsibility seduces him into enjoying power for its own sake, rather than for its substantive purpose.

刚发现本书，贴在这

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4793069-the-vocation-lectures

@Ciao 我担心多数人看不懂英文，所以加个翻译……

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2018/01/17/politics-in-china-weighs-heavily-on-business.html