@永川龙 #188292 谁在炒作？民众吗？民众会炒作吗？媒体炒作？媒体炒作是为了市场。

@两百斤 #188270 真经啊

@Wolfychan #188288 可以理解

@两百斤 #188269 抓人也要按照基本法，先制定一个“禁止极权主义政党法”，再来一个“去纳粹化和去共产化法令”。

媒体炒作是市场行为还是政治导向？

@ZEROHOUR #188228 你这话直接用江选的形式写出来就好了

日本乡村？不都进城了？

@沉默的广场 #188191 我觉得吧，他喜欢贴大字报，我们就把他当乐子，也算求仁得仁吧？

I read The Star’s story about the absurd judgment in favor of a Missouri woman who contracted an STD from her boyfriend while having unprotected sex in his car. (June 9, 1A, “Missouri court affirms $5.2M for woman who got HPV in car”) As a retired insurance executive, I could not believe what I was reading.

Are there any more details as to the policy limits available under the Geico policy and whether the insured carried an umbrella policy and what limits?

I cannot for the life me understand how the court can render a plaintiff judgment under an auto policy in the first place, and how it could hold Geico to an award that I am sure far exceeds the policy limits.

汽车保险太神奇，真不愧是巴菲特的保险公司